1.7 sec in total
154 ms
1.4 sec
216 ms
Click here to check amazing Paper Depot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about paperdepot.us
Paper Depot Inc. is a company who aproaches to the necesites of our clients by providing them with best quality on our products.
Visit paperdepot.usWe analyzed Paperdepot.us page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
paperdepot.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.829
4/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
154 ms
37 ms
55 ms
51 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Paperdepot.us, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (579 ms) belongs to the original domain Paperdepot.us.
Page size can be reduced by 89.3 kB (9%)
947.3 kB
858.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Paperdepot.us main page is 947.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 670.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paper Depot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paperdepot.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (68%)
68
22
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paper Depot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.paperdepot.us
154 ms
modernizr.min.js
37 ms
utilities.js
55 ms
css
51 ms
css
52 ms
css
66 ms
animate.css
71 ms
bootstrap.min.css
57 ms
font-awesome.min.css
49 ms
quicksearch.css
51 ms
magnific-popup.css
64 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
78 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
98 ms
default_modified.css
85 ms
responsive.css
94 ms
quick_view.css
107 ms
dropdown-cart.css
106 ms
flexslider.css
122 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
125 ms
instafeed.min.js
140 ms
jquery.quicksearch.js
134 ms
matchMedia.js
144 ms
classie.js
161 ms
mobilecheck.js
171 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
157 ms
quick_view.js
191 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
189 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
172 ms
js.cookie.js
221 ms
wow.min.js
200 ms
ella.js
204 ms
HaloMegaMenu.js
210 ms
jquery.min.js
161 ms
analytics.js
54 ms
box-shadow-mobile.png
51 ms
Logos%202019.png
136 ms
thumbnail.asp
27 ms
logo-fixed.png
293 ms
slaider-2022.jpg
295 ms
slaider-1.jpg
328 ms
slaider-2.jpg
296 ms
banner1.jpg
293 ms
banner2.jpg
292 ms
banner3.jpg
387 ms
4%20parts%20gd_pk_ca_wh_thumbnail.png
330 ms
5%20parts%20wh-gn-ca-pk-gd_thumbnail.png
361 ms
6%20parts%20gd-pk-ca-gn-bl-wh_thumbnail.png
377 ms
golden_thumbnail.png
388 ms
green_thumbnail.png
434 ms
fullWidthBlock-bg.jpg
376 ms
collection-1.jpg
434 ms
collection-2.jpg
435 ms
collection-3.jpg
434 ms
brand1.png
437 ms
brand2.png
439 ms
brand3.png
458 ms
brand4.png
437 ms
brand5.png
435 ms
VS.png
437 ms
AE.png
463 ms
MC.png
474 ms
PP.png
458 ms
sprite-icons.png
440 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
82 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
100 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
100 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
99 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
30 ms
collect
20 ms
collect
70 ms
module-heading-bg.png
392 ms
social.png
371 ms
js
194 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf
48 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf
129 ms
sdk.js
209 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
200 ms
count.asp
546 ms
3dvisit.asp
579 ms
ga-audiences
181 ms
recent
249 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu52xP.ttf
51 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ABc9.ttf
51 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf
51 ms
sdk.js
29 ms
spacer.gif
28 ms
paperdepot.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paperdepot.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
paperdepot.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paperdepot.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Paperdepot.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paperdepot.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paper Depot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: