867 ms in total
43 ms
537 ms
287 ms
Click here to check amazing Patchstack content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about patchstack.com
Keep your WordPress sites safe from vulnerable plugins & themes. Protect sites with virtual patching.
Visit patchstack.comWe analyzed Patchstack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 824 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
patchstack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value3,090 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
43 ms
32 ms
15 ms
19 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Patchstack.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (235 ms) relates to the external source Cdnjs.cloudflare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 194.1 kB (30%)
641.3 kB
447.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Patchstack.com main page is 641.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 229.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 176.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Patchstack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Patchstack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)
67
37
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Patchstack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
patchstack.com
43 ms
patchstack.com
32 ms
blocks.style.build.css
15 ms
ecf.css
19 ms
style.min.css
25 ms
style.css
29 ms
aos.css
27 ms
oxygen.css
29 ms
style.css
32 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
aos.js
32 ms
script.js
63 ms
15094.css
138 ms
14104.css
139 ms
7201.css
43 ms
12988.css
136 ms
universal.css
46 ms
highlight.min.js
56 ms
popper.min.js
133 ms
tippy.umd.min.js
218 ms
gsap.min.js
235 ms
ScrollTrigger.min.js
234 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
235 ms
app.build.js
40 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
40 ms
hooks.min.js
43 ms
i18n.min.js
42 ms
web-components.esm.js
43 ms
lottie-player.min.js
46 ms
lottie-interactivity.js
45 ms
intersectionobserver.js
45 ms
lottie-init.js
48 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
131 ms
flickity-init-4.js
50 ms
logo.svg
104 ms
patchstack_protection_fp-1.webp
103 ms
patchstack_dashboard_fp-1.webp
103 ms
software-gallery-1-opt.webp
34 ms
patchstack_reports-1-opt.webp
36 ms
dashboard-gallery-mobile-1.webp
32 ms
confetti.webp
97 ms
visualcomposer_256x2-opt.webp
33 ms
elementor_256x256.svg
34 ms
wprocket_256x256-opt.webp
34 ms
wpbakery_256x256-opt.webp
36 ms
mainwp_256x256.png
36 ms
slider-revolution.png
39 ms
clicky_256x256.svg
107 ms
protection@2x-2-300x-opt.webp
38 ms
miriam.jpg
39 ms
jeff-mankini.webp
39 ms
joost1.webp
40 ms
liza.webp
41 ms
elementor-logo.svg
97 ms
upclick.png
93 ms
group-one.svg
110 ms
alert-700x700-1-2-30-opt.webp
94 ms
automate@2x-2-300x30-1.webp
95 ms
map3-1.png
114 ms
yes.svg
111 ms
fp-reviews-g2.svg
99 ms
Icon-StarFull.svg
101 ms
sitecare-new-webp-2-opt.webp
102 ms
plesk-new-webp-2-opt.webp
103 ms
optilogo326-1-webp-2-opt.webp
105 ms
xxl-new-webp-2-opt.webp
107 ms
logo-opt-300x32.webp
106 ms
EIC-logo-CoFundedBy-opt.webp
107 ms
logo.png
108 ms
Faktum-WideSemiBold.woff
6 ms
Faktum-WideMedium.woff
45 ms
Faktum-WideRegular.woff
47 ms
Faktum-Regular.woff
47 ms
Faktum-SemiBold.woff
47 ms
Faktum-Bold.woff
47 ms
patchstack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
patchstack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
patchstack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Patchstack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Patchstack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
patchstack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Patchstack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: