1.7 sec in total
75 ms
1.6 sec
70 ms
Click here to check amazing PATH content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about path.pm
Project Management System
Visit path.pmWe analyzed Path.pm page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
path.pm performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
75 ms
208 ms
104 ms
38 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Path.pm, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (459 ms) belongs to the original domain Path.pm.
Page size can be reduced by 84.2 kB (17%)
500.9 kB
416.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Path.pm main page is 500.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 375.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PATH images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Path.pm needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (93%)
86
6
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PATH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 57 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
path.pm
75 ms
path.pm
208 ms
login
104 ms
path-icon.css
38 ms
reset.css
66 ms
styles.css
77 ms
sumogallery.css
89 ms
mcustom_scroll.css
98 ms
daterangepicker.css
105 ms
jquery-ui-1.11.0.css
118 ms
application.css
134 ms
responsive.css
140 ms
jquery-1.11.1-ui-1.11.0-ujs-3.1.4.js
217 ms
application.js
152 ms
responsive.js
178 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
180 ms
modernizr.custom.js
162 ms
classie.js
166 ms
custom.js
179 ms
jquery.circliful.js
196 ms
jquery.sumogallery.js
191 ms
mcustom_scroll.js
244 ms
jquery-ui.js
247 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
266 ms
additional-methods.min.js
215 ms
jquery.scrolling-tabs.js
243 ms
action_cable.js
260 ms
cable.js
264 ms
notification.js
264 ms
countdown.js
282 ms
jquery.remotipart.js
268 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
269 ms
readmore.js
309 ms
viewer.css
294 ms
viewer.js
301 ms
jquery-viewer.js
321 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
44 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
295 ms
theme.js
342 ms
js
55 ms
js
112 ms
hint.css
327 ms
a_common_styles.css
286 ms
rmp_settings.css
270 ms
bootstrap.min.css
296 ms
modal_windows.css
286 ms
keyboard_shortcuts.css
278 ms
time_logger.css
270 ms
redmine_agile.css
259 ms
helpdesk.css
261 ms
user_activity.css
236 ms
guru.css
229 ms
scope.css
245 ms
select2.css
236 ms
contacts.css
230 ms
buttons.css
252 ms
utils.js
233 ms
bootstrap.min.js
263 ms
bootstrap.modal.ext.js
238 ms
patches.js
210 ms
modal_windows.js
195 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
31 ms
jquery.cookie.js
192 ms
keyboard_shortcuts.js
240 ms
redmine_s3.js
218 ms
time_logger.js
218 ms
blocking_namespace.js
214 ms
blocking_schedule.js
397 ms
blocking_module.js
444 ms
blocking_polyfill.js
215 ms
blocking_render.js
220 ms
blocking_utils.js
216 ms
blocking_dynamic_loading.js
215 ms
easy_togglers.js
459 ms
jquery.entityarray.js
217 ms
render_polyfill.js
213 ms
redmine_extensions.js
215 ms
user_activity.js
214 ms
scope.js
228 ms
select2.js
231 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
select2_helpers.js
198 ms
contacts_select2.js
213 ms
contacts.js
218 ms
collect
13 ms
js
52 ms
path_logo.svg
189 ms
google-g-2015.svg
46 ms
login-page.jpg
160 ms
proximanova-regular.woff
384 ms
proxima_nova_semibold.woff
326 ms
path.pm accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
path.pm best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
path.pm SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Path.pm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Path.pm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
path.pm
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PATH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: