Access paymentsnext.com. Payments NEXT: Global payments industry news

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

paymentsnext.com

135 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

styles.css

50 ms

min.css

50 ms

style.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Paymentsnext.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (429 ms) belongs to the original domain Paymentsnext.com.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Paymentsnext.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 150.3 kB

Original 167.9 kB
After minification 116.3 kB
After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.5 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Payments NEXT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

Original 167.6 kB
After minification 167.6 kB
After compression 133.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

Original 49.4 kB
After minification 49.4 kB
After compression 44.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paymentsnext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Payments NEXT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paymentsnext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paymentsnext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

paymentsnext.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Payments NEXT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Payments NEXT: Global payments industry news

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

paymentsnext.com

style.min.css

styles.css

min.css

style.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

paymentsnext.com

style.min.css

styles.css

min.css

style.css

font-awesome.min.css

css

css

css

css

css

picturefill.min.js

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

counter.js

pagecount.min.js

hooks.min.js

i18n.min.js

index.js

index.js

all-min.js

sticky-min.js

scripts.js

main.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

analytics.js

7a103863.png

logo.png

mobile-wallet-payments-1052x526.jpg

growth-of-open-banking-331x219.jpg

banking-telecom-convergence-331x219.jpg

Brazil-Pix-fintech-revolution-1-331x219.jpg

business-travelers-331x219.jpg

PayPal-friendly-fraud-problems-331x219.jpg

US-chargebacks-cost-15.6-billion-331x219.jpg

false-declines-tips-331x219.jpg

chargebacks-challenge-331x219.jpg

GPG-banner.jpg

mobile-wallet-payments-331x219.jpg

business-travelers-90x68.jpg

Data-Driven-Decisions-90x68.jpg

skyhigh-swipe-fees-90x68.png

the-future-of-payments-90x68.jpg