Tools & Wizards About Us
pcbancard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

pcbancard.com

PCBancard : We eliminate credit card processing fees.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

934 ms

Page Rendered

312 ms

pcbancard.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing PCBancard content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pcbancard.com

We help merchants to offset some or all of their merchant service fees without increasing the overall rates. We eliminate credit card processing fees.

Visit pcbancard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pcbancard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pcbancard.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pcbancard.com

95 ms

js

105 ms

style-index.css

14 ms

styles.css

31 ms

lc-public.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Pcbancard.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Pcbancard.wpengine.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (428 ms) relates to the external source Pcbancard.wpengine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pcbancard.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 614.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 110.7 kB

  • Original 137.1 kB
  • After minification 132.7 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 614.6 kB
  • After minification 614.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PCBancard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 458.3 kB
  • After minification 458.3 kB
  • After compression 456.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 221.2 kB
  • After minification 218.0 kB
  • After compression 212.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pcbancard.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (93%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PCBancard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pcbancard.com

pcbancard.com

95 ms

js

js

105 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

14 ms

styles.css

styles.css

31 ms

lc-public.css

lc-public.css

30 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

30 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

29 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

69 ms

print.css

print.css

41 ms

style_dynamic_callback.php

style_dynamic_callback.php

131 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

49 ms

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php

style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php

62 ms

css

css

45 ms

core-dashboard.min.css

core-dashboard.min.css

56 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

62 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

64 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

97 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

99 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

101 ms

post-41309.css

post-41309.css

100 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

103 ms

post-11.css

post-11.css

102 ms

modern.css

modern.css

100 ms

css

css

63 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

103 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

106 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

125 ms

loader.js

loader.js

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

125 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

129 ms

lc-public.js

lc-public.js

124 ms

embed.php

embed.php

224 ms

css

css

92 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

123 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

128 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

127 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

128 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

129 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

123 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

109 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

110 ms

site_tracking.js

site_tracking.js

108 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

109 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

107 ms

index.js

index.js

104 ms

index.js

index.js

99 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

135 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

105 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

87 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

84 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

85 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

113 ms

style.css

style.css

86 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

109 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

80 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

78 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

75 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

75 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

76 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

74 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

82 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

71 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

72 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

54 ms

skrollr.js

skrollr.js

58 ms

TweenLite.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

53 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

58 ms

smoothPageScroll.min.js

smoothPageScroll.min.js

55 ms

default_dynamic_callback.php

default_dynamic_callback.php

173 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

60 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

63 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

66 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

70 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

64 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

70 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

73 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

75 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

89 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

49 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

45 ms

digitalyellow_offset_circle.png

digitalyellow_offset_circle.png

46 ms

Twitter_Cover_2.png

Twitter_Cover_2.png

121 ms

HurmeGeometricSans3.otf

HurmeGeometricSans3.otf

409 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

92 ms

HurmeGeometricSans3-Black.otf

HurmeGeometricSans3-Black.otf

424 ms

HurmeGeometricSans3-Bold.otf

HurmeGeometricSans3-Bold.otf

386 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

264 ms

diffuser.js

diffuser.js

92 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

240 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

213 ms

HurmeGeometricSans3-SemiBold.otf

HurmeGeometricSans3-SemiBold.otf

428 ms

linea-ecommerce-10.woff

linea-ecommerce-10.woff

95 ms

linea-basic-10.woff

linea-basic-10.woff

95 ms

HurmeGeometricSans3-Light.otf

HurmeGeometricSans3-Light.otf

395 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

240 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

240 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

272 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eI.woff

273 ms

prism.app-us1.com

prism.app-us1.com

238 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

168 ms

Accessibility Review

pcbancard.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pcbancard.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pcbancard.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pcbancard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pcbancard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pcbancard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PCBancard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: