3.4 sec in total
652 ms
2.1 sec
623 ms
Click here to check amazing Perq content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about perq.com
Discover PERQ, the only multifamily automation solution with a plethora of AI tools that increase your property conversion with less work and cost.
Visit perq.comWe analyzed Perq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 652 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
perq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value11,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.209
59/100
15%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
652 ms
35 ms
99 ms
87 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Perq.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ws.rightonin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (784 ms) belongs to the original domain Perq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 858.4 kB (61%)
1.4 MB
555.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Perq.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 621.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Perq needs image optimization as it can save up to 73.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 442.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 442.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 289.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 289.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)
60
31
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
perq.com
652 ms
layout-helper-classes.css
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
99 ms
styles.css
87 ms
style.css
126 ms
font-awesome.min.css
85 ms
jquery.js
148 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
89 ms
jssor.js
142 ms
jssor.slider.js
162 ms
jquery.form.min.js
140 ms
scripts.js
139 ms
all.js
169 ms
conversion.js
75 ms
tum3ytk.js
325 ms
0BxiGwbauiaqaREVJdWdzaTBWb0E
154 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
52 ms
bootstrap.min.css
75 ms
282fe8
37 ms
0BxiGwbauiaqaREVJdWdzaTBWb0E
452 ms
fbds.js
160 ms
ga.js
159 ms
perq-header-logo-white.png
124 ms
purple-perq-brand-header.png
122 ms
front-page-header-image.jpg
278 ms
company-recognition.png
247 ms
BG-Angles.png
124 ms
purple-circle-icon1.png
124 ms
purple-circle-icon2.png
245 ms
purple-circle-icon3.png
248 ms
purple-circle-icon4.png
247 ms
purple-background-image1.jpg
277 ms
floating-plus-icon-2.png
247 ms
fatwin-technology.png
261 ms
vertise.png
275 ms
white-indent.png
262 ms
white-square.png
275 ms
whatwedo-image1.jpg
278 ms
whatwedo-logo2.png
277 ms
whatwedo-image2.jpg
315 ms
whatwedo-logo1.png
316 ms
whatwedo-image3.jpg
316 ms
whatwedo-logo3.png
304 ms
purple-background-image2.png
509 ms
greatclips.png
313 ms
honda.png
338 ms
midas.png
504 ms
hhgreg.png
337 ms
gianteagle.png
337 ms
mazda.png
507 ms
loading.gif
784 ms
a22.png
518 ms
282FE8_1_0.woff
412 ms
282FE8_3_0.woff
409 ms
282FE8_4_0.woff
485 ms
capture.js
125 ms
count.js
124 ms
136 ms
360 ms
__utm.gif
43 ms
perq.com
360 ms
entypo.woff
331 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
collect
286 ms
247 ms
plugins.js
225 ms
FF4D00-0.8.png
55 ms
ga-audiences
232 ms
DISQ_9755cLJtjw5AZzTt4Di7oamDlyKjeeL7vAfZbCffwefggMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mufb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
34 ms
XNqUuSHu-g9ApeEnZWUj9yJfhDuWNPA7hNognf1qwObffJnjMUMdeMJ6Mk6g5gBfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
75 ms
XLvELAltxlfL4cbrYwrDxm6Ejse3zXGAfJo0rqy0USqffVEgggMdeMJ6Mk6g5MFfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
106 ms
O-7yR6mWsltej0dvavYEQe31pnkW4dv2lC1xOHTh5EXffJxjMUMdeMJ6Mk6g5MBfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
134 ms
TbxUpiidO51f79ZjM8xoNHEVsJgUzwJjCAHMno_pPLtffVruggMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mifb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
135 ms
37 ms
p.gif
151 ms
perq.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
perq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
perq.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Perq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
perq.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Perq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: