1.5 sec in total
263 ms
690 ms
516 ms
Click here to check amazing Peter Foot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about peterfoot.net
Some links to all my profiles in one place. Peter's Blog MVP Profile
Visit peterfoot.netWe analyzed Peterfoot.net page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
peterfoot.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value3.1 s
92/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
263 ms
28 ms
78 ms
107 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Peterfoot.net, 25% (12 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 19% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (263 ms) belongs to the original domain Peterfoot.net.
Page size can be reduced by 461.3 kB (68%)
680.2 kB
218.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Peterfoot.net main page is 680.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 507.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 946 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Peter Foot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 384.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 384.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Peterfoot.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (65%)
31
11
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Peter Foot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
peterfoot.net
263 ms
webfont.js
28 ms
78 ms
css
107 ms
86 ms
88 ms
103 ms
gprofiles.js
101 ms
wpgroho.js
100 ms
gravatar-profile.css
73 ms
services.css
100 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
99 ms
tiled-gallery.css
81 ms
75 ms
widgets.js
58 ms
78 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
199 ms
w.js
61 ms
merriweather.css
15 ms
fa15aeeccc4b23e8a4677aeacb65b7bb
132 ms
adapter-cart.png
152 ms
smile.svg
128 ms
fa15aeeccc4b23e8a4677aeacb65b7bb
190 ms
widgets.js
125 ms
xaml2015.png
97 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
121 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
73 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
73 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6npK87lA5VkoZ9MEfk0lvEWI.ttf
143 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
80 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ntIoQl57Hlnr-S18thSTvQ4.ttf
155 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcsBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
155 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
155 ms
BjAYBlHtW3CJxDcjzrnZCAzzZlagSe_blz3aczwf9QY.ttf
156 ms
So5lHxHT37p2SS4-t60SlNR9Cp5k2PU5byCQEVyBk1k.ttf
155 ms
merriweather-italic-webfont.ttf
88 ms
merriweather-lightitalic-webfont.ttf
89 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwIOCVHqAhACcEzPbnyDemdqQ.ttf
161 ms
merriweather-bolditalic-webfont.ttf
89 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwIO8uG85xWIViYncxAXQzvRM.ttf
155 ms
Noticons.svg
80 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
48 ms
82 ms
hovercard.css
66 ms
43 ms
g.gif
37 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
peterfoot.net accessibility score
peterfoot.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
peterfoot.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peterfoot.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Peterfoot.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
peterfoot.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Peter Foot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: