2.7 sec in total
562 ms
2 sec
175 ms
Welcome to pfiffel.com homepage info - get ready to check Pfiffel best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pfiffel.com
Visit pfiffel.comWe analyzed Pfiffel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
pfiffel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
562 ms
123 ms
14 ms
21 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Pfiffel.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (562 ms) belongs to the original domain Pfiffel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 188.4 kB (51%)
367.0 kB
178.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Pfiffel.com main page is 367.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 275.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pfiffel needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 135.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.6 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pfiffel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (47%)
55
29
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pfiffel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pfiffel.com
562 ms
style.css
123 ms
adsbygoogle.js
14 ms
show_ads.js
21 ms
ca-pub-2430843555198080.js
82 ms
zrt_lookup.html
204 ms
show_ads_impl.js
86 ms
line_1024_new2.png
171 ms
pfiffel_logo_glow_144px.png
313 ms
favicon.png
270 ms
favicon.png
268 ms
favicon.png
269 ms
favicon.png
288 ms
favicon.png
317 ms
favicon_youtube.ico
395 ms
favicon_twitch.ico
394 ms
ads
302 ms
osd.js
27 ms
ads
241 ms
179 ms
adj
123 ms
beacon
121 ms
6015450386557452979
49 ms
abg.js
53 ms
m_js_controller.js
66 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
47 ms
s
33 ms
x_button_blue2.png
32 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
4 ms
259 ms
0
99 ms
surly.js
27 ms
ba.html
18 ms
pixel
40 ms
lidar.js
21 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
19 ms
4.gif
28 ms
4311.js
28 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
23 ms
pixel
96 ms
pixel
97 ms
sd
5 ms
index.html
246 ms
verify_selector.js
132 ms
blank.gif
142 ms
bapi
105 ms
verifyr.js
28 ms
beacon.js
76 ms
dbapi
58 ms
0
48 ms
bg.png
62 ms
adchoices.en.png
81 ms
dt
71 ms
Rejuvenation_728x90_logo.gif
36 ms
Rejuvenation_728x90_bg.jpg
68 ms
dt
55 ms
box_19_top-right.png
9 ms
ci.png
12 ms
ui
45 ms
pfiffel.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
pfiffel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
pfiffel.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pfiffel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pfiffel.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
pfiffel.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pfiffel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: