6.1 sec in total
2 sec
3.5 sec
618 ms
Click here to check amazing Pflegekraft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pflegekraft.click
Sie pflegen einen Angehörigen, kommen aber an Ihre Grenzen? Wir können helfen mit Pflegekräften aus Polen ab 800,- €/Mo. (eff.)!
Visit pflegekraft.clickWe analyzed Pflegekraft.click page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
pflegekraft.click performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.5 s
0/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.9 s
1/100
10%
Value5,040 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
2024 ms
243 ms
361 ms
332 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Pflegekraft.click, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Pflegekraft.click.
Page size can be reduced by 179.7 kB (27%)
657.8 kB
478.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Pflegekraft.click main page is 657.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 356.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pflegekraft needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pflegekraft.click needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 35% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (73%)
71
19
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pflegekraft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pflegekraft.click
2024 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
243 ms
go_pricing_skin_green.css
361 ms
bootstrap.css
332 ms
typo.css
203 ms
jstuff.css
207 ms
animate.css
212 ms
vegas.css
216 ms
hover.css
217 ms
font-awesome.css
305 ms
nexus.css
314 ms
owl.carousel.css
445 ms
owl.theme.css
448 ms
owl.transitions.css
452 ms
style.css
446 ms
style.css
466 ms
shortcodes.css
323 ms
modal.css
314 ms
jquery.min.js
394 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
407 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
418 ms
scrolltotop_jq.js
421 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
544 ms
TweenMax.min.js
59 ms
js
79 ms
jquery.gomap-1.3.2.min.js
606 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
655 ms
caption.js
431 ms
bootstrap.min.js
443 ms
modernizr.custom.js
616 ms
jdownloadurl.js
502 ms
extrawatch.js
510 ms
shortcodes.js
613 ms
mootools-core.js
616 ms
core.js
525 ms
mootools-more.js
749 ms
modal.js
611 ms
responsive.css
714 ms
css
42 ms
css
58 ms
css
59 ms
modernizr.custom.js
622 ms
jquery.vegas.js
648 ms
responsive-nav.js
711 ms
jquery.sticky.js
712 ms
scripts.js
733 ms
addthis_widget.js
56 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
767 ms
q
147 ms
jquery.stellar.js
763 ms
gen_204
115 ms
common.js
42 ms
util.js
103 ms
geocoder.js
43 ms
analytics.js
173 ms
299 ms
pflegekraft.jpg
448 ms
pflegekraft.click
518 ms
extrawatch-logo-16x16.gif
174 ms
logo_pflegekraft.png
173 ms
pflegekraft2.jpg
243 ms
agent.js
153 ms
shadow_3.png
147 ms
shadow_4.png
137 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
127 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
128 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
240 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
239 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
53 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
52 ms
linkid.js
17 ms
pflegekraft.click
519 ms
collect
17 ms
447 ms
imtranslator-s.png
6 ms
Telefon_Icon.png
117 ms
collect
132 ms
left_quote.png
118 ms
right_quote.png
115 ms
blazy.js
130 ms
ga-audiences
79 ms
jetzt-anrufen.png
117 ms
WhatsApp.jpg
190 ms
pflegekraft.click accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pflegekraft.click best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pflegekraft.click SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pflegekraft.click can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pflegekraft.click main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pflegekraft.click
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pflegekraft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: