Tools & Wizards About Us
pgdcorp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

pgdcorp.com

Port Graham Technologies – Alaska Native Corporation (ANC) | 8(a) Companies

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

604 ms

pgdcorp.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pgdcorp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pgdcorp.com

Visit pgdcorp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pgdcorp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pgdcorp.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value38.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.816

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pgdcorp.com

54 ms

portgraham.tech

1131 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

style.min.css

215 ms

styles.css

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pgdcorp.com, 90% (73 requests) were made to Portgraham.tech and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Portgraham.tech.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (21%)

Content Size

10.9 MB

After Optimization

8.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pgdcorp.com main page is 10.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 59.4 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 418.2 kB

  • Original 8.6 MB
  • After minification 8.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pgdcorp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 778.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 314.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 778.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 138.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pgdcorp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (69%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pgdcorp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pgdcorp.com

pgdcorp.com

54 ms

portgraham.tech

portgraham.tech

1131 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

105 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

215 ms

styles.css

styles.css

134 ms

visual-composer.css

visual-composer.css

138 ms

smoothbox-min.css

smoothbox-min.css

134 ms

viewer.css

viewer.css

132 ms

dustrial-master.css

dustrial-master.css

156 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

227 ms

css

css

27 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

304 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

224 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

185 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

211 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

234 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

266 ms

slick.css

slick.css

264 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

315 ms

gutenberg-custom.css

gutenberg-custom.css

275 ms

dustrial-style.css

dustrial-style.css

402 ms

dustrial-responsive.css

dustrial-responsive.css

320 ms

dustrial-default.css

dustrial-default.css

317 ms

style.css

style.css

323 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

434 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

409 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

463 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

490 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

326 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

382 ms

index.js

index.js

425 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

425 ms

smoothbox-min.js

smoothbox-min.js

429 ms

viewer.js

viewer.js

432 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

480 ms

dustrial-master.js

dustrial-master.js

481 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

481 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

520 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

518 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

469 ms

jquery.barfiller.js

jquery.barfiller.js

465 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

464 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

464 ms

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

506 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

485 ms

dustrial-script.js

dustrial-script.js

461 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

435 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

433 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

421 ms

cropped-Port-Graham-Logo-1-1-scaled-1.jpg

cropped-Port-Graham-Logo-1-1-scaled-1.jpg

199 ms

stock-1-2.png

stock-1-2.png

198 ms

shutterstock_747606229-362x262.jpg

shutterstock_747606229-362x262.jpg

196 ms

port-graham-it-technology-362x262.jpg

port-graham-it-technology-362x262.jpg

199 ms

port-graham-it-tracking--362x262.jpg

port-graham-it-tracking--362x262.jpg

195 ms

Port-Graham-ANC-contractors-682x682.jpg

Port-Graham-ANC-contractors-682x682.jpg

237 ms

IMG_6429-362x262.jpg

IMG_6429-362x262.jpg

245 ms

telecommunications-anc-companies-362x262.jpg

telecommunications-anc-companies-362x262.jpg

243 ms

us-forest-service-anc-contractors-362x262.jpg

us-forest-service-anc-contractors-362x262.jpg

246 ms

bureau-of-reclamation-anc-contractors-362x262.jpg

bureau-of-reclamation-anc-contractors-362x262.jpg

253 ms

us-geological-survey-anc-contractors-voip-362x262.jpg

us-geological-survey-anc-contractors-voip-362x262.jpg

253 ms

dept-of-the-interior-362x262.jpg

dept-of-the-interior-362x262.jpg

293 ms

Port-Graham-Logo5.jpg

Port-Graham-Logo5.jpg

292 ms

company-bg-1-2.png

company-bg-1-2.png

558 ms

Port-graham-technologies-ANC-federal-contracting.jpg

Port-graham-technologies-ANC-federal-contracting.jpg

556 ms

Port-Graham-ANC-companies.jpg

Port-Graham-ANC-companies.jpg

341 ms

Port-graham-technologies-ANC-federal-contracting-alaska.jpg

Port-graham-technologies-ANC-federal-contracting-alaska.jpg

354 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

289 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4ATGwgDI.ttf

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4ATGwgDI.ttf

62 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiBhc9V0.ttf

5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiBhc9V0.ttf

112 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiBhc9V0.ttf

5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiBhc9V0.ttf

113 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiBhc9V0.ttf

5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiBhc9V0.ttf

138 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiBhc9V0.ttf

5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiBhc9V0.ttf

118 ms

port-graham-technologies.jpg

port-graham-technologies.jpg

559 ms

portgraham.tech

portgraham.tech

1101 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

313 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

349 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

300 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

301 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

347 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

357 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

358 ms

Accessibility Review

pgdcorp.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pgdcorp.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pgdcorp.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pgdcorp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pgdcorp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pgdcorp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pgdcorp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: