5.5 sec in total
233 ms
4.8 sec
455 ms
Click here to check amazing Phenotype content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phenotype.net
Web Design & Development in Cheltenham. We are award winning, experienced, digital specialists, with a history of creating amazing projects.
Visit phenotype.netWe analyzed Phenotype.net page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
phenotype.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value13.7 s
2/100
10%
Value25,240 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.537
14/100
15%
Value32.2 s
0/100
10%
233 ms
325 ms
302 ms
13 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Phenotype.net, 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Phenotype.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (33%)
3.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Phenotype.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 301.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Phenotype needs image optimization as it can save up to 301.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 463.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 463.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 310.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phenotype.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 310.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (24%)
46
35
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phenotype. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.phenotype.net
233 ms
dY3RDsIgDEV_aFj35PcwVrAJtIQWF_9e2UxMXHy95-TcGYKw-WAuSivuBsQh9xUVgiqoPTPqNEPDh2ZasUFTV3NPxIeAZsRpKFuN7Z1yLEaRgjcSdotvu_cPTlewOwrj5woWEVNrvn5J7ByGr2MouPfiiPkNVQpeCvGpU3zi8eSq1F5PuPqES6e8_pAX.css
325 ms
M9AvyUjNz0vVTyvNSy7JzM8rBgnkpuonFxfrZyYD-QA.css
302 ms
css
13 ms
css
24 ms
css
26 ms
theme-style.php
829 ms
lY5RDsIwDEMvtLbiSKXNtqA2KUlKxe0ZYsAXCCRL_rCf5cGSm4BqGM0hpdIzaDhtOneQ627T-KnmKi4SDXxFmg5B4KIFM0gQda30BemNeFuhQuuUVm_MRf-FtiKXbsi0k6PNwmSO2HDGFO-RO0Z5nnuMvabSV0Q_Zjc.js
317 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
297 ms
dY5BDsIwDAQ_RBPgwnuM47apkjjYTqX-nsKJQrhY2hlpvRePXAzQhpElDzcfC6YWSP2iXlFiNT2dvc3EhV7szmxqAvVAl0cj2dwksLkcS8_NUY3lv-aVJETpOQThNgoFpdTze6owUYH1YDN8vcK2T8huB5lcVDau1Ot738QQSK4_ez9Lng.js
473 ms
M9AvyUjNz0vVTyvNSy7JzM8r1i9ITE9NKs3MSUkt0s8qBsnnpuohCQIA.js
475 ms
wp-embed.min.js
491 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
174 ms
loading.gif
213 ms
cropped-favicon.png
246 ms
slide-hills-beacon.jpg
296 ms
logo-thehotelcollection.jpg
215 ms
logo_0007_unilever.jpg
306 ms
logo_0011_nike.jpg
180 ms
logo_0010_paramount.jpg
382 ms
logo_0020_skype.jpg
400 ms
logo_0021_channel5.jpg
408 ms
logo_0022_amnesty.jpg
449 ms
logo_0012_un.jpg
502 ms
logo_0015_compass.jpg
497 ms
logo_0018_king.jpg
581 ms
logo_0017_animal-planet.jpg
609 ms
logo_0016_faber.jpg
507 ms
logo_0006_golana.jpg
635 ms
logo-disney.jpg
693 ms
logo-levis.jpg
736 ms
logo-thefa.jpg
777 ms
logo-hearst.jpg
805 ms
isotope-loading.gif
791 ms
brand-sum-glitch-large-1-600x480.jpg
838 ms
arobaze_0001_at-sea-800x480.jpg
1526 ms
goodywater-V3-800x480.jpg
1544 ms
engins-section-feed-800x480.png
1563 ms
brand-sum-glitch-large-600x480.jpg
1575 ms
comp-v1-800x480.jpg
929 ms
10406_300x250.gif
2807 ms
IMG_1368-800x480.jpg
2591 ms
Logos-Marks_0002_tothepowerofn-800x480.jpg
2610 ms
800-eye-800x480.jpg
2640 ms
cIFypx4yrWPDz3zOxk7hIQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
110 ms
KZIBeBMugm8Hv3hZPrGeC1KPGs1ZzpMvnHX-7fPOuAc.woff
112 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b73hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
112 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBTG_owQUHpNX9rkRdZ1lhPA.woff
110 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
110 ms
gFXtEMCp1m_YzxsBpKl68jG_owQUHpNX9rkRdZ1lhPA.woff
112 ms
SKK6Nusyv8QPNMtI4j9J2zG_owQUHpNX9rkRdZ1lhPA.woff
111 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcnbFhgvWbfSbdVg11QabG8w.woff
112 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvpNFNvkUT5WL5Ivd-iWIzE.woff
111 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fckKmoMc60pzO8y939PlblnU.woff
111 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2846 ms
icon.woff
2592 ms
ga.js
49 ms
arrow_up.png
2655 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
phenotype.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phenotype.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
phenotype.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phenotype.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phenotype.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phenotype.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phenotype. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: