4 sec in total
236 ms
3.3 sec
487 ms
Visit phlyt.io now to see the best up-to-date Phlyt content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about phlyt.io
We are pleased to share that the team from Phlyt, experts in cloud-native development, has joined Red Hat to enable us to help even more customers with digital transformation initiatives.
Visit phlyt.ioWe analyzed Phlyt.io page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
phlyt.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.7 s
0/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
Value50,050 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value74.2 s
0/100
10%
236 ms
159 ms
289 ms
365 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Phlyt.io, 72% (23 requests) were made to Redhat.com and 25% (8 requests) were made to Static.redhat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (365 ms) relates to the external source Static.redhat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 907.8 kB (69%)
1.3 MB
400.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Phlyt.io main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 930.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 719 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Phlyt needs image optimization as it can save up to 719 B or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 113.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.5 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 718.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phlyt.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 718.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (69%)
29
9
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phlyt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
phlyt.io
236 ms
welcoming-phlyts-team-cloud-native-development-experts-red-hat
159 ms
trustarc.js
289 ms
trustecm.js
365 ms
dtm.js
173 ms
css__k9aoxkMyjUtSX9AXGCPExPgTYjM0Xv5OYNfbFGDRafY__N9sjJtGj85lXtvOptw2e_YZ01FXbTXcJywP8EaKBijU__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.css
94 ms
webrh.webcomponents.min.css
43 ms
webrh.min.css
38 ms
css__RorljR-lPKl3vfg62B7ncM7eQE07ne4Vn_OLwoHyp-g__hUur8hTgvaWIEL5_AYonO3DbsCrTt6YfxodLVkWPUXI__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.css
87 ms
css__rifeal4Dr8bB772PnpxxWxHYqmWcdsdqyceV-4Qo0l0__X3i6byLx2kXmXC_30fE5WfLMjElZqHBvu9z6iSupENg__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.css
43 ms
css__4Nq1a_8bNoRsE77XjnL9oXMrIezkUW_eK0M44VmZWbk__NU5y3-ivyS4r2TJJuLytjM7VOJF4W8czfq8TsqMBBeo__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.css
169 ms
trustecm.css
316 ms
advanced-theme.css
316 ms
red-hat-font.min.css
320 ms
js__B6wED6l5P_XUdxVmb7Nvh5d9zn074QukFqJa2HLXS6c__VzWs8XZBHHsPW77egi-W-FQw2mAEr5F-GgCJU0wn3Nc__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.js
102 ms
webrh.vendor.min.js
103 ms
webrh.webcomponents.min.js
184 ms
webrh.min.js
101 ms
js__pDOiYGKaYbdKNp1gvMxR0fWhWZnfUemYDUhADyCn3oM__jCrCuWCJIPYPe1FzZoUvsJWEjkNMmRIQHYek1h7idBE__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.js
150 ms
js__f27SEy1GKT9ouERmo5kuM0Q2VDJ2zZHupN3GT1ogqAI__ujJdXPl4lRqODrS6ibF9dyr_o2naB3ES31cOOmCOE-U__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.js
149 ms
rh-footer-entry.js
148 ms
js__dUmq0VBoGPE8KPKu6JYKOU5gQRazZPF8igE2FcpJbqs__VeO8_DaIzZJpC20NGPzzjs7y9ouo-qRs5sJYaoDAF-Y__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.js
183 ms
RXzcB
183 ms
menus-nav2
201 ms
web-icon-globe.svg
197 ms
web-icon-user.svg
113 ms
web-icon-search.svg
110 ms
talk-bubble.svg
105 ms
red-hat-300x300.png
108 ms
logo.svg
109 ms
css__wpajrf8pWA19ifT2xQXPB3J1TByoCXqZVtt6kXfl4Ow__PFQbFxxWsZl0yTnfrpPiA-o5Pvtu-CXh7nICx08JW0c__uaCwYofnUZLAnB7x3Q6WyVKHfqU6f9iB6Wi31ydea6c.css
74 ms
rh-web-iconfont.woff
128 ms
phlyt.io accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
phlyt.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
phlyt.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phlyt.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phlyt.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phlyt.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phlyt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: