7 sec in total
15 ms
6.4 sec
595 ms
Click here to check amazing Phoenix content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phoenix.in
Energy & Infrastructure solutions, leveraging actionable intelligence, for a sustainable world.
Visit phoenix.inWe analyzed Phoenix.in page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
phoenix.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value3,880 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
15 ms
1174 ms
71 ms
1155 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Phoenix.in, 73% (61 requests) were made to Fluentgrid.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Fluentgrid.com.
Page size can be reduced by 266.1 kB (7%)
3.6 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Phoenix.in main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 196.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phoenix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 47% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (51%)
63
31
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phoenix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
phoenix.in
15 ms
fluentgrid.com
1174 ms
gtm.js
71 ms
8ef453512217fc077c404b00251a56e3.css
1155 ms
css
43 ms
jquery.min.js
916 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
696 ms
slick-slider.min.js
700 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
716 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
968 ms
front.js
694 ms
js
57 ms
js
62 ms
widget.js
49 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
694 ms
waypoints.min.js
719 ms
counterup.min.js
903 ms
jquery.sticky-sidebar.min.js
1121 ms
tilt.jquery.js
1122 ms
theme.js
1122 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1121 ms
masonry.min.js
1205 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1207 ms
rbsvgi_f.js
1205 ms
rbtools.min.js
1505 ms
rs6.min.js
1808 ms
script.min.js
1271 ms
rb-portfolio.js
1504 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1504 ms
slick.min.js
1504 ms
wppsac-public.js
1504 ms
transition.min.js
1804 ms
vc_carousel.min.js
1804 ms
lazyload.min.js
1804 ms
js
70 ms
dummy.png
746 ms
js
106 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff
99 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPezSQ.woff
100 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
257 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
261 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
263 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
262 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
264 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
262 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
265 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
263 ms
setech.svg
802 ms
setech.woff
800 ms
Flaticon.svg
986 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
bg_b.png
931 ms
power-utility.jpg
1630 ms
City-infrastructure-solution.jpg
1812 ms
bg_05.jpg
881 ms
meterdataa.jpg
1813 ms
IOC-.jpg
1351 ms
collect
327 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1517 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
388 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1034 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
536 ms
ajax-loader.gif
946 ms
Fluentgrid-logo-gray.png
961 ms
Fluentgrid-logo-white.png
959 ms
UNGC.jpg
1193 ms
gartner-hype-cycle-2022.jpg
1862 ms
ET-Energy-Leadership.jpg
1695 ms
Iconic-brand-of-india-2023.jpg
1228 ms
Fluentgrid-CIS.jpg
1424 ms
MDMS-2023-Slide-scaled.jpg
1438 ms
NDMC-1.jpg
1423 ms
NDMCcs.jpg
1468 ms
ICCC_vizag.jpg
1655 ms
GVMCcs.jpg
1649 ms
Guwhati_Smart_Grid.jpg
1667 ms
APDCLlf.jpg
1707 ms
1.png
1876 ms
fg-partners.png
1884 ms
fg-patnerslt.png
1896 ms
11.png
1933 ms
fg-partner-mobile.png
1947 ms
fg-patner-lt.png
2084 ms
phoenix.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phoenix.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
phoenix.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phoenix.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phoenix.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phoenix.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phoenix. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: