985 ms in total
126 ms
771 ms
88 ms
Visit phonetodd.com now to see the best up-to-date Phone Todd content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about phonetodd.com
Voted Best Cell Phone Repair 5 times and Best Computer Repair 3 Times
Visit phonetodd.comWe analyzed Phonetodd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 859 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
phonetodd.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
126 ms
49 ms
42 ms
98 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Phonetodd.com, 45% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (11 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 766.3 kB (53%)
1.4 MB
675.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Phonetodd.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 829.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 660.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 660.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Phone Todd needs image optimization as it can save up to 101.7 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 56 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phonetodd.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phone Todd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.phonetodd.com
126 ms
minified.js
49 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
42 ms
polyfill.min.js
98 ms
mobile-app-invite-banner.css
38 ms
mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js
93 ms
thunderbolt-commons.718dbdea.bundle.min.js
69 ms
main.a041a540.bundle.min.js
191 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
191 ms
lodash.min.js
192 ms
react.production.min.js
192 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
196 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
192 ms
e51320_deda816a8e3244978592d7d003f1a5a7~mv2_d_6600_2400_s_4_2.png
388 ms
bundle.min.js
170 ms
035244_00366f402f0741ccb7282fd0f8ab76b5~mv2.png
134 ms
035244_da6f98d310bd4fcf85ea276ea15a5401~mv2.png
132 ms
334670897_2321492348031221_2439995825896487007_n.jpg
299 ms
PT.jpg
277 ms
p.jpg
302 ms
ironpatern.84ec58ff.png
129 ms
9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
7 ms
97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
64 ms
133 ms
123 ms
124 ms
123 ms
122 ms
118 ms
197 ms
192 ms
189 ms
176 ms
144 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
38 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
9 ms
phonetodd.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
phonetodd.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
phonetodd.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phonetodd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phonetodd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phonetodd.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phone Todd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: