Tools & Wizards About Us
photofancy.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

photofancy.co.uk

PhotoFancy.co.uk - Edit photos online, style your own photos with professional effects and create collages online

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

251 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

346 ms

photofancy.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Photo Fancy content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about photofancy.co.uk

Edit photos online for free, select from a wide range of photo effects, create collages online and send E-Cards with your photos.

Visit photofancy.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Photofancy.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

photofancy.co.uk performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.089

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

photofancy.co.uk

251 ms

www.photofancy.co.uk

467 ms

weltpixel_custom_header_storeview_uk.min.css

89 ms

weltpixel_custom_footer_storeview_uk.min.css

178 ms

weltpixel_product_store_storeview_uk.min.css

262 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Photofancy.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Consent-eu.cookiefirst.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Photofancy.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.4 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Photofancy.co.uk main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 79.0 kB

  • Original 97.0 kB
  • After minification 88.1 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photo Fancy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 193 B

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 1.5 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 237.5 kB
  • After minification 237.5 kB
  • After compression 236.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photofancy.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (76%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photo Fancy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

photofancy.co.uk

photofancy.co.uk

251 ms

www.photofancy.co.uk

www.photofancy.co.uk

467 ms

weltpixel_custom_header_storeview_uk.min.css

weltpixel_custom_header_storeview_uk.min.css

89 ms

weltpixel_custom_footer_storeview_uk.min.css

weltpixel_custom_footer_storeview_uk.min.css

178 ms

weltpixel_product_store_storeview_uk.min.css

weltpixel_product_store_storeview_uk.min.css

262 ms

weltpixel_category_store_storeview_uk.min.css

weltpixel_category_store_storeview_uk.min.css

266 ms

styles-m.min.css

styles-m.min.css

530 ms

button.min.css

button.min.css

268 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

315 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

281 ms

autocomplete.min.css

autocomplete.min.css

348 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

354 ms

algolia-reset.min.css

algolia-reset.min.css

354 ms

instantsearch.v3.min.css

instantsearch.v3.min.css

374 ms

recommend.min.css

recommend.min.css

407 ms

bootstrap_grid.min.css

bootstrap_grid.min.css

435 ms

font-icons-core.min.css

font-icons-core.min.css

445 ms

social-icons.min.css

social-icons.min.css

444 ms

styled-icons.min.css

styled-icons.min.css

467 ms

font-icons-extended.min.css

font-icons-extended.min.css

499 ms

bootstrap_table.min.css

bootstrap_table.min.css

520 ms

utilities.min.css

utilities.min.css

569 ms

tabs.min.css

tabs.min.css

570 ms

toggles-accordions.min.css

toggles-accordions.min.css

570 ms

headings.min.css

headings.min.css

591 ms

blockquotes.min.css

blockquotes.min.css

607 ms

dividers.min.css

dividers.min.css

616 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

618 ms

pagetitle.min.css

pagetitle.min.css

618 ms

columns_grids.min.css

columns_grids.min.css

653 ms

feature-box-core.min.css

feature-box-core.min.css

683 ms

feature-box-extended.min.css

feature-box-extended.min.css

693 ms

alerts.min.css

alerts.min.css

704 ms

bootstrap_buttons.min.css

bootstrap_buttons.min.css

705 ms

buttons.min.css

buttons.min.css

707 ms

animate-core.min.css

animate-core.min.css

746 ms

btt_button.min.css

btt_button.min.css

775 ms

js

js

66 ms

consent.js

consent.js

422 ms

jquery.fullPage.min.css

jquery.fullPage.min.css

778 ms

custom.min.css

custom.min.css

708 ms

df108449fe8dc044f65ef468fc1fb8e4.min.js

df108449fe8dc044f65ef468fc1fb8e4.min.js

1072 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

90 ms

pf_logo_light.svg

pf_logo_light.svg

95 ms

category-mobile-effects_1.jpg

category-mobile-effects_1.jpg

371 ms

category-mobile-collage_1.jpg

category-mobile-collage_1.jpg

521 ms

category-mobile-magicname_1.jpg

category-mobile-magicname_1.jpg

353 ms

textcontent-effects-1.png

textcontent-effects-1.png

265 ms

textcontent-effects-1_1.png

textcontent-effects-1_1.png

662 ms

textcontent-collage-1.png

textcontent-collage-1.png

356 ms

textcontent-magicname-1.png

textcontent-magicname-1.png

576 ms

PhotoFancy-Logo_white.png

PhotoFancy-Logo_white.png

520 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-regular.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-regular.woff

446 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-300.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-300.woff

500 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-600.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-600.woff

500 ms

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-700.woff

open-sans-v34-latin_latin-ext-700.woff

501 ms

Luma-Icons.woff

Luma-Icons.woff

502 ms

lined-icons.woff

lined-icons.woff

556 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

555 ms

banner.no-autoblock.js

banner.no-autoblock.js

101 ms

js-translation.json

js-translation.json

126 ms

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

110 ms

jquery_lazyload.min.js

jquery_lazyload.min.js

126 ms

category-effects_2.jpg

category-effects_2.jpg

93 ms

category-collage_1.jpg

category-collage_1.jpg

175 ms

category-magicname_1.jpg

category-magicname_1.jpg

94 ms

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

91 ms

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

91 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

90 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

89 ms

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

dcf2abf6022ef8d0395f5c3ad9c0555f.min.css

91 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

90 ms

navigation_mobile.min.css

navigation_mobile.min.css

89 ms

Accessibility Review

photofancy.co.uk accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

photofancy.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

photofancy.co.uk SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photofancy.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Photofancy.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

photofancy.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photo Fancy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: