Tools & Wizards About Us
pilot.com.tr screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

pilot.com.tr

Pilot Seating

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

541 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

77 ms

pilot.com.tr screenshot

About Website

Visit pilot.com.tr now to see the best up-to-date Pilot content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pilot.com.tr

Visit pilot.com.tr

Key Findings

We analyzed Pilot.com.tr page load time and found that the first response time was 541 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pilot.com.tr performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pilot.com.tr

541 ms

pilot.com.tr

606 ms

www.pilot.com.tr

1101 ms

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Pilot.com.tr, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Pilot.com.tr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (66%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

884.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pilot.com.tr main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 486.8 kB
  • After minification 461.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pilot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 931.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 311.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 931.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 766.0 kB

  • Original 871.6 kB
  • After minification 688.0 kB
  • After compression 105.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pilot.com.tr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 766.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (76%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pilot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pilot.com.tr

pilot.com.tr

541 ms

pilot.com.tr

pilot.com.tr

606 ms

www.pilot.com.tr

www.pilot.com.tr

1101 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

163 ms

font-awesome-all.css

font-awesome-all.css

609 ms

elpath.css

elpath.css

688 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

452 ms

color.css

color.css

454 ms

fullpage.min.css

fullpage.min.css

453 ms

tema.css

tema.css

1029 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

1328 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

753 ms

css_browser_selector.min.js

css_browser_selector.min.js

612 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

766 ms

css

css

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

915 ms

js

js

64 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

970 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

33 ms

pixi.min.js

pixi.min.js

40 ms

buro-workers.min.js

buro-workers.min.js

1670 ms

main-engine.min.js

main-engine.min.js

1072 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1471 ms

script.js

script.js

1122 ms

fullpage.min.js

fullpage.min.js

1189 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

logo-white2.png

logo-white2.png

173 ms

shape-51.png

shape-51.png

173 ms

shape-21.png

shape-21.png

174 ms

hakkimizdafull.jpg

hakkimizdafull.jpg

459 ms

iaa-transportation_1.jpg

iaa-transportation_1.jpg

362 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

62 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

68 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

91 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

100 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

100 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

399 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

405 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

288 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

366 ms

Accessibility Review

pilot.com.tr accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pilot.com.tr best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

pilot.com.tr SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pilot.com.tr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pilot.com.tr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pilot.com.tr

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pilot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: