1 sec in total
122 ms
491 ms
416 ms
Welcome to pipe.org homepage info - get ready to check Pipe best content right away, or after learning these important things about pipe.org
P.I.P.E. was formed in 1980 to improve communications between labor and management, to explore joint approaches to problems and to prevent potential problems, to improve occupational safety and health...
Visit pipe.orgWe analyzed Pipe.org page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 907 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
pipe.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
122 ms
17 ms
6 ms
4 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Pipe.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (202 ms) belongs to the original domain Pipe.org.
Page size can be reduced by 25.8 kB (7%)
379.1 kB
353.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Pipe.org main page is 379.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 338.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pipe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipe.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (24%)
38
29
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pipe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
pipe.org
122 ms
www.pipe.org
17 ms
pipeCSS.css
6 ms
pipeNavCSS.css
4 ms
ga.js
49 ms
pageTile.jpg
186 ms
logoHeader.jpg
189 ms
searchGObutton.jpg
186 ms
searchFieldBG.jpg
186 ms
navBarStartOn.jpg
186 ms
navTabPipePart.jpg
187 ms
navTabRight.jpg
179 ms
navTabWhyPipeOff.jpg
180 ms
navBarMiddle.jpg
177 ms
navTabProgramsOff.jpg
180 ms
navTabYourPipeOff.jpg
183 ms
navTabContactOff.jpg
183 ms
navTabIndustryLinksOff.jpg
183 ms
navTabOfficersOff.jpg
180 ms
navTabComplianceOff.jpg
190 ms
navBarEndOff.jpg
185 ms
navDivider.jpg
188 ms
headerPic2.jpg
202 ms
mainContentz.jpg
194 ms
clearPixel.gif
190 ms
titleLine.jpg
194 ms
welcomePic.jpg
198 ms
industryHomePic.jpg
198 ms
programsHomePic.jpg
199 ms
buildGreenHomePic.jpg
195 ms
bottomPipeLogo.jpg
195 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
navTabWhyPipeOn.jpg
11 ms
navTabProgramsOn.jpg
12 ms
navTabYourPipeOn.jpg
12 ms
navTabContactOn.jpg
12 ms
navTabIndustryLinksOn.jpg
13 ms
navTabOfficersOn.jpg
12 ms
navTabComplianceOn.jpg
13 ms
navTabLeft.jpg
14 ms
navBarEndOn.jpg
32 ms
navTabLeft2.jpg
28 ms
pipe.org accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pipe.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
pipe.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipe.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pipe.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
pipe.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pipe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: