3 sec in total
99 ms
1.3 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing PIPING GUIDE content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pipingguide.net
A Unique blog for Oil and Gas Professionals covering topics related to Piping and Process.
Visit pipingguide.netWe analyzed Pipingguide.net page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
pipingguide.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
99 ms
99 ms
89 ms
149 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Pipingguide.net, 13% (14 requests) were made to Ps.eyeota.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (485 ms) relates to the external source Ey.c.appier.net.
Page size can be reduced by 243.2 kB (46%)
530.1 kB
286.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Pipingguide.net main page is 530.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 273.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIPING GUIDE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipingguide.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 58% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (79%)
98
21
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIPING GUIDE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pipingguide.net
99 ms
www.pipingguide.net
99 ms
1708208307-widget_css_bundle.css
89 ms
authorization.css
149 ms
all.js
161 ms
plusone.js
101 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
element.js
63 ms
3084.js
33 ms
loader.min.js
34 ms
jquery.min.js
85 ms
310590189-widgets.js
120 ms
brand
65 ms
www.pipingguide.net
137 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
94 ms
google_top_exp.js
11 ms
zrt_lookup.html
39 ms
show_ads_impl.js
39 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
31 ms
pipingguide
126 ms
subscribe-1.gif
127 ms
124 ms
blank.html
25 ms
ads
423 ms
icon_comments.gif
51 ms
osd.js
40 ms
navbar.g
64 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
37 ms
ads
414 ms
translateelement.css
63 ms
main.js
120 ms
icons_orange.png
94 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
91 ms
arrows-blue.png
90 ms
www.pipingguide.net
86 ms
ga.js
41 ms
xd_arbiter.php
166 ms
xd_arbiter.php
298 ms
blogger_index.js
90 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
34 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
33 ms
fastbutton
128 ms
element_main.js
80 ms
__utm.gif
54 ms
postmessageRelay
84 ms
quant.js
62 ms
cc.js
85 ms
css
62 ms
widgets.min.css
13 ms
3084.user.css
14 ms
3084.admin.css
56 ms
8992
77 ms
hammer.min.js
39 ms
featherlight.min.js
63 ms
image-scale.min.js
37 ms
count.js
59 ms
translate_24dp.png
125 ms
l
95 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
81 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
81 ms
32 ms
api.js
80 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
143 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
140 ms
pixel;r=201936131;a=p-USH5YgkCFNTVM;fpan=1;fpa=P0-302562285-1456803608500;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456803608500;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pipingguide.net%2F;ogl=
58 ms
generic
65 ms
282 ms
62 ms
psonawsync
485 ms
psonawsync
485 ms
articles
113 ms
count-data.js
82 ms
abg.js
36 ms
generic
17 ms
match
14 ms
match
16 ms
utsync.ashx
27 ms
pixel
29 ms
match
8 ms
match
18 ms
match
21 ms
match
20 ms
match
31 ms
match
28 ms
match
27 ms
match
27 ms
match
27 ms
14463057456598225707
24 ms
s
21 ms
m_js_controller.js
22 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
37 ms
x_button_blue2.png
37 ms
match
25 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
4 ms
limk-related-widget.min.js
24 ms
logo-widget.png
7 ms
noscript.gif
89 ms
noscript.gif
89 ms
noscript.gif
89 ms
119 ms
minimize.png
12 ms
maximize.png
2 ms
match
4 ms
pipingguide.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pipingguide.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
pipingguide.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipingguide.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pipingguide.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pipingguide.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIPING GUIDE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: