2.6 sec in total
547 ms
1.6 sec
469 ms
Click here to check amazing Pixefly content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixefly.com
Professional Laravel, Wordpress & PHP Website Design & Development Company - Gurgaon, India
Visit pixefly.comWe analyzed Pixefly.com page load time and found that the first response time was 547 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
pixefly.com performance score
547 ms
24 ms
126 ms
179 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Pixefly.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (592 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixefly.com.
Page size can be reduced by 404.4 kB (26%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixefly.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 992.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixefly images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 177.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixefly.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 177.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (57%)
53
23
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixefly. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixefly.com
547 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
126 ms
dashicons.min.css
179 ms
wpgmza_style.css
103 ms
jquery.js
231 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
149 ms
css
65 ms
bootstrap.min.css
327 ms
font-awesome.min.css
169 ms
style.css
344 ms
bootstrap.min.js
484 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
20 ms
main.js
203 ms
soliloquy.css
202 ms
afp-style.css
235 ms
colorbox.css
233 ms
adipoli.css
245 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
294 ms
maxmegamenu.js
295 ms
wp-embed.min.js
295 ms
soliloquy-min.js
323 ms
jquery-easing.js
396 ms
quicksand.js
342 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
341 ms
afp-functions.js
361 ms
adipoli.js
377 ms
collect
53 ms
store_bage.png
176 ms
pattern.jpg
166 ms
logo.png
177 ms
team.png
175 ms
creative_banner-2000x799_c.jpg
351 ms
agile.png
165 ms
creative.png
175 ms
timely_service.png
175 ms
heading-bg.png
257 ms
responsive_web_platform.png
354 ms
laravel_logo.png
327 ms
wordpress_logo.png
219 ms
php_logo.png
229 ms
joomla_logo.png
274 ms
contact_bg_white.jpg
371 ms
drsafehands.png
592 ms
preloader.gif
297 ms
left.png
444 ms
right.png
372 ms
circle.png
362 ms
circle-hover.png
375 ms
pause.png
390 ms
play.png
412 ms
video.png
433 ms
yYRnAC2KygoXnEC8IdU0gQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
140 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
468 ms
overlay.png
327 ms
pixefly.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixefly.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Pixefly.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixefly.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixefly. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: