8.9 sec in total
1.3 sec
6.6 sec
943 ms
Welcome to pixel-studios.com homepage info - get ready to check Pixel Studios best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about pixel-studios.com
We are a Digital Design, Marketing & Technology Company offering UI/UX, Website Design, SMO, Web Apps and SEO to transform your business.
Visit pixel-studios.comWe analyzed Pixel-studios.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
pixel-studios.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value2,930 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
1332 ms
1428 ms
956 ms
1237 ms
1984 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Pixel-studios.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixel-studios.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (28%)
3.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixel-studios.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixel Studios images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 503.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 503.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 426.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixel-studios.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 426.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (36%)
81
52
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixel Studios. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixel-studios.com
1332 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1428 ms
pixel-style.css
956 ms
animate.css
1237 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
1984 ms
bootstrap.min.js
764 ms
css3-mediaqueries.js
1169 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1038 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
957 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1400 ms
pixel-logo1.png
243 ms
fb.jpg
284 ms
banner3.jpg
1858 ms
banner1.jpg
989 ms
banner2.jpg
582 ms
1.jpg
243 ms
2.jpg
580 ms
3.jpg
581 ms
4.jpg
578 ms
5.jpg
818 ms
6.jpg
821 ms
7.jpg
818 ms
8.jpg
821 ms
9.jpg
1021 ms
strategy-consulting.png
1050 ms
creative-design.png
1039 ms
web-mobile-app.png
1052 ms
online-marketing.png
1225 ms
work1.jpg
2211 ms
work2.jpg
2479 ms
work3.jpg
1851 ms
work4.jpg
2581 ms
work5.jpg
1851 ms
work6.jpg
1854 ms
work7.jpg
2178 ms
work8.jpg
2005 ms
work9.jpg
2300 ms
work10.jpg
2261 ms
work11.jpg
2666 ms
case1.png
2943 ms
case2.png
2530 ms
video1.jpg
2555 ms
play-icon.png
2716 ms
video4.jpg
2784 ms
video3.jpg
2811 ms
gtm.js
71 ms
david.jpg
2831 ms
sdk.js
217 ms
rpcD32xfNXY
185 ms
bQ8v6RPtomU
268 ms
kpYQVqgG0xE
192 ms
analytics.js
102 ms
www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css
106 ms
www-embed-player.js
294 ms
base.js
374 ms
collect
47 ms
collect
44 ms
opensans-light-webfont.woff
2679 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
2693 ms
collect
249 ms
collect
248 ms
411 ms
bone.jpg
2745 ms
xd_arbiter.php
279 ms
xd_arbiter.php
524 ms
widget_v2.134.js
22 ms
customer1.jpg
2499 ms
customer2.jpg
2520 ms
customer3.jpg
2581 ms
captcha-image.png
2595 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
49 ms
ad_status.js
48 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
101 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
104 ms
arrow-left.png
2400 ms
arrow-right.png
2461 ms
common-pattern-medium.png
2505 ms
common-pattern-low.png
2540 ms
orange-bg.png
2413 ms
quote-bg.png
2376 ms
fb.png
2426 ms
tweet.png
2476 ms
linked-in.png
2523 ms
g-plus.png
2395 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
84 ms
youtube.png
1786 ms
pin.png
1799 ms
bx_loader.gif
1848 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
2 ms
pixel-studios.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixel-studios.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pixel-studios.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixel-studios.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixel-studios.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixel-studios.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixel Studios. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: