1.9 sec in total
146 ms
1.7 sec
130 ms
Welcome to pixel.net homepage info - get ready to check Pixel best content right away, or after learning these important things about pixel.net
QuickPace OPNFIL A simple yet powerful command can seamlessly open any Windows PC File and Web page from iSeries. When opening an image file in simple display mode, it can be opened via build-in funct...
Visit pixel.netWe analyzed Pixel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pixel.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value28,130 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value39.0 s
0/100
10%
146 ms
254 ms
251 ms
367 ms
354 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pixel.net, 52% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 33% (11 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 394.1 kB (48%)
829.1 kB
434.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Pixel.net main page is 829.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 483.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 379.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 379.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 56 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (33%)
27
18
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pixel.net
146 ms
minified.js
254 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
251 ms
polyfill.min.js
367 ms
bootstrap-features.1a99b4a8.bundle.min.js
354 ms
main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js
353 ms
lodash.min.js
349 ms
react.production.min.js
349 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
348 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
339 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
339 ms
PixelColorTrans2.png
480 ms
thunderbolt
323 ms
QuickPaths.png
995 ms
41d000_49ada530b6ba556a7869e34099f6dedc.png
430 ms
41d000_4b20c51884edfe6352e14865d4e4d0b6.png
437 ms
41d000_fd6af978f810b6ab7838c54a86f44821.png
380 ms
41d000_545b05cf9a08d44c1e94c1c8ce13c6b1.png
317 ms
41d000_22e9fa16469d44b4fffac0a567e5718d.png
350 ms
41d000_3987f317aa9b77c52c40790da8c3330e.png
351 ms
41d000_5e6f2cd1ce55f7440e121bac7fd0cf69.png
347 ms
41d000_78fd6715decd97f7aa532f0dace75d5d.png
347 ms
41d000_cc1d4036e38dfe01bb77203df758296a.png
424 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
20 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
19 ms
4cefdf47-0136-4169-9933-3225dbbec9d9.woff
13 ms
eb1185bb-8f9d-4855-83fa-d06f0efef677.woff
15 ms
1c7b5ef1-5b09-4473-8003-a974846653a7.woff
15 ms
thunderbolt
15 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
15 ms
bolt-performance
23 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
pixel.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
pixel.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pixel.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixel.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: