Tools & Wizards About Us
pixel.pl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

pixel.pl

System dynamicznej informacji pasażerskiej - PIXEL

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

656 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

pixel.pl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing PIXEL content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixel.pl

System dynamicznej informacji pasażerskiej, system monitoringu wizyjnego, system poboru opłat, system zliczania pasażerów.

Visit pixel.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixel.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 656 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixel.pl performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.pixel.pl

656 ms

language-selector.css

114 ms

bootstrap.min.css

35 ms

slider-pro.css

225 ms

styles.css

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Pixel.pl, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixel.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 473.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

8.5 MB

After Optimization

8.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixel.pl main page is 8.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 8.0 MB
  • After minification 7.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIXEL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 261.3 kB

  • Original 370.2 kB
  • After minification 325.0 kB
  • After compression 108.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 146.3 kB

  • Original 176.5 kB
  • After minification 162.9 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixel.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (54%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIXEL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.pixel.pl

www.pixel.pl

656 ms

language-selector.css

language-selector.css

114 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

35 ms

slider-pro.css

slider-pro.css

225 ms

styles.css

styles.css

228 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

229 ms

style4.css

style4.css

245 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

529 ms

style.css

style.css

466 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css

335 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

457 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

345 ms

timeline.min.js

timeline.min.js

354 ms

colorbox.js

colorbox.js

445 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

457 ms

public.css

public.css

465 ms

default.css

default.css

557 ms

jquery.sliderPro.js

jquery.sliderPro.js

575 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

571 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

587 ms

functions.js

functions.js

589 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

610 ms

sitepress.js

sitepress.js

672 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

685 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js

690 ms

jquery.easing.pack.js

jquery.easing.pack.js

687 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

688 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

606 ms

css

css

24 ms

pasekl2.png

pasekl2.png

714 ms

pl.jpg

pl.jpg

279 ms

en.jpg

en.jpg

277 ms

home.png

home.png

279 ms

sliderx1.jpg

sliderx1.jpg

1346 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

649 ms

Autobus2.png

Autobus2.png

1766 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

850 ms

ariva.png

ariva.png

1738 ms

tramwaje-_sl%C4%85skie.png

tramwaje-_sl%C4%85skie.png

2051 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

1170 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

1086 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

1329 ms

pixmet.png

pixmet.png

1283 ms

logotypy.png

logotypy.png

1391 ms

vv7C11sgT0bZpsnDJRVPNfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

vv7C11sgT0bZpsnDJRVPNfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

8 ms

fMdPRPskyY3ckg8ymVQ5Nl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

fMdPRPskyY3ckg8ymVQ5Nl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

10 ms

em1T6bxBT1C9Ui5lcPwYd102b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

em1T6bxBT1C9Ui5lcPwYd102b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

11 ms

kcO_Mk7pjy8jlu86STaVz102b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

kcO_Mk7pjy8jlu86STaVz102b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf

14 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

34 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

1260 ms

slider_text3.jpg

slider_text3.jpg

1265 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

bullets.png

bullets.png

1265 ms

slider_link.png

slider_link.png

763 ms

Accessibility Review

pixel.pl accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

pixel.pl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pixel.pl SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixel.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixel.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixel.pl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIXEL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: