2.4 sec in total
307 ms
1.7 sec
405 ms
Visit pixelconcept1.com now to see the best up-to-date Pixelconcept 1 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixelconcept1.com
Pixel concept est une agence de communication basée àAgadir (Maroc) Experte en Creation web , stratégie d’entreprise et evénementiel , elle s’adapte et s’investit pleinement dans chaque projet en prop...
Visit pixelconcept1.comWe analyzed Pixelconcept1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
pixelconcept1.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value6,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.305
39/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
307 ms
101 ms
312 ms
202 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Pixelconcept1.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (870 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixelconcept1.com.
Page size can be reduced by 352.2 kB (11%)
3.3 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixelconcept1.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixelconcept 1 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 159.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelconcept1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 159.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (52%)
50
24
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixelconcept 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixelconcept1.com
307 ms
bootstrap.min.css
101 ms
style.css
312 ms
icons.css
202 ms
animate.css
207 ms
responsive.css
198 ms
peter_river.css
188 ms
css
20 ms
css
71 ms
adsbygoogle.js
26 ms
jquery.min.js
450 ms
bootstrap.min.js
283 ms
theme20.js
302 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
300 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
300 ms
jquery.knob.js
482 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
482 ms
gmap3.js
488 ms
jquery.tweet.js
481 ms
custom.js
485 ms
zrt_lookup.html
35 ms
show_ads_impl.js
274 ms
maps
260 ms
8.jpg
461 ms
head.jpg
237 ms
logo.png
236 ms
reflect.png
234 ms
s1.jpg
613 ms
s3.jpg
535 ms
halieutis.jpg
614 ms
erfoud2016-palmagro.jpg
534 ms
erfoud2016.jpg
666 ms
ws19.jpg
547 ms
im1.jpg
633 ms
meknes16.jpg
632 ms
w13.jpg
645 ms
b1.jpg
764 ms
ws8.jpg
870 ms
ws20.jpg
767 ms
30.jpg
769 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
674 ms
Metrize-Icons.svg
844 ms
wEO_EBrOk8hQLDvIAF81VvoP_kgXiQ.ttf
129 ms
6NUT8F6PJgbFWQn47_x7pOskyf9Ddt0.ttf
131 ms
embed
279 ms
cookie.js
96 ms
integrator.js
51 ms
ads
39 ms
js
40 ms
gen_204
18 ms
init_embed.js
39 ms
common.js
63 ms
util.js
64 ms
map.js
55 ms
overlay.js
107 ms
onion.js
74 ms
search_impl.js
73 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
46 ms
pixelconcept1.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixelconcept1.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
pixelconcept1.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelconcept1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Pixelconcept1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixelconcept1.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixelconcept 1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: