2.4 sec in total
471 ms
1.7 sec
217 ms
Welcome to pixelgaga.com homepage info - get ready to check Pixelgaga best content right away, or after learning these important things about pixelgaga.com
Hari Menon
Visit pixelgaga.comWe analyzed Pixelgaga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 471 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pixelgaga.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
471 ms
78 ms
16 ms
304 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Pixelgaga.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixelgaga.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (34%)
3.3 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixelgaga.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixelgaga images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 649.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 649.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 302.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelgaga.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 302.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (74%)
23
6
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixelgaga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pixelgaga.com
471 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
78 ms
css
16 ms
style.css
304 ms
styles.css
149 ms
sb-instagram.min.css
151 ms
jquery.js
234 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
151 ms
modernizr.min.js
177 ms
webfont.js
4 ms
plugins.js
448 ms
main.js
323 ms
scripts.js
225 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
wp-embed.min.js
265 ms
css
23 ms
css
23 ms
css
24 ms
pic_home.jpg
460 ms
hari_menon_photography-300x300-1.png
106 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
166 ms
entypo.svg
204 ms
entypo.woff
228 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
10 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
11 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
10 ms
300lo.json
51 ms
sh.48536d49e4da3bdba54606b4.html
31 ms
menu.6e2a0c622721f73d6fce.js
8 ms
pixelgaga.com accessibility score
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixelgaga.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pixelgaga.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelgaga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Pixelgaga.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixelgaga.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixelgaga. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: