8.2 sec in total
815 ms
6.9 sec
526 ms
Click here to check amazing Pixellicious content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixellicious.com
Give your business an online identity. Whether it’s a portfolio, or company details or an e-commerce store, we can get your presence online.
Visit pixellicious.comWe analyzed Pixellicious.com page load time and found that the first response time was 815 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pixellicious.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value19.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value2,910 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.187
65/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
815 ms
440 ms
595 ms
20 ms
394 ms
Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Pixellicious.com, 18% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixellicious.com.
Page size can be reduced by 184.4 kB (29%)
638.2 kB
453.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Pixellicious.com main page is 638.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 293.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixellicious images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixellicious.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (95%)
96
5
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixellicious. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 51 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixellicious.com
815 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
440 ms
style.min.css
595 ms
css
20 ms
menu-animation.min.css
394 ms
sina-morphing.min.css
396 ms
style.min.css
447 ms
zombify.min.css
551 ms
froala_editor.pkgd.min.css
600 ms
froala_style.min.css
606 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
636 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
641 ms
zombify-plugins.min.css
751 ms
style.min.css
796 ms
style.min.css
810 ms
style.min.css
998 ms
style.min.css
834 ms
style.min.css
842 ms
style.min.css
954 ms
wpsr.min.css
1007 ms
all.css
54 ms
xoo-el-style.css
1037 ms
xoo-el-fonts.css
1038 ms
xoo-aff-style.css
1153 ms
all.min.css
1193 ms
select2.css
1203 ms
cb70d11b8.min.css
1201 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
1235 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1233 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
1350 ms
frontend.min.css
1404 ms
post-4189.css
1431 ms
frontend.min.css
1608 ms
all.min.css
1432 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1438 ms
global.css
1556 ms
post-5790.css
1669 ms
css
53 ms
js
68 ms
adsbygoogle.js
76 ms
frontend.css
1344 ms
post-6289.css
1303 ms
post-6009.css
1301 ms
icofont.min.css
1328 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1374 ms
post-4603.css
1272 ms
wp-review.css
1265 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1243 ms
solid.min.css
1269 ms
brands.min.css
1328 ms
regular.min.css
1385 ms
sina-widgets.min.css
1316 ms
reading-progress.min.css
1266 ms
animations.min.css
1257 ms
jquery.min.js
1409 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1318 ms
zombify-main-scripts.min.js
1262 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1233 ms
style.min.js
1687 ms
register-sw.js
1679 ms
select2.js
1655 ms
xoo-aff-js.js
1655 ms
smooth-scrollbar.js
1541 ms
xoo-el-js.js
1496 ms
cb70d11b8.min.js
1491 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1491 ms
underscore.min.js
1462 ms
wp-util.min.js
1471 ms
main.js
1361 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
1284 ms
jscripts-ftr2-min.js
1287 ms
frontend.js
1277 ms
wp-socializer.min.js
1346 ms
reading-progress.min.js
1453 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1872 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2016 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2015 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2013 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2012 ms
hooks.min.js
1938 ms
i18n.min.js
2184 ms
frontend.min.js
2385 ms
waypoints.min.js
2353 ms
core.min.js
2344 ms
swiper.min.js
2454 ms
share-link.min.js
2261 ms
dialog.min.js
2268 ms
frontend.min.js
2261 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
2406 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
2259 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
2192 ms
analytics.js
1247 ms
js
264 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
1247 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
260 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
1457 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
1568 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
261 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
1568 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
1563 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
1562 ms
o-0IIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNr5TRF.ttf
1581 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjFhdVZNyE.ttf
1582 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjThZVZNyE.ttf
1584 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjKhVVZNyE.ttf
1583 ms
o-0OIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjhgRCQ_w.ttf
1591 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjOhBVZNyE.ttf
1590 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjXhFVZNyE.ttf
1589 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjQhJVZNyE.ttf
1588 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjZhNVZNyE.ttf
1582 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2112 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2303 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
922 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1698 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1696 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1542 ms
6ae-4KCqVa4Zy6Fif-UC2FHS.ttf
1580 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
1586 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
1585 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
1586 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
1585 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
1584 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
1585 ms
eicons.woff
2230 ms
icofont.woff
2715 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2107 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2107 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1535 ms
popup-sidebar.jpg
2154 ms
Easy-Login.ttf
1477 ms
collect
163 ms
admin-ajax.php
1565 ms
superpwa-manifest.json
202 ms
pixellicious.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pixellicious.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
pixellicious.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixellicious.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixellicious.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixellicious.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pixellicious. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: