Tools & Wizards About Us
pixotritechnologies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

pixotritechnologies.com

Software Development | Website design | Digital Marketing | Melbourne

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

pixotritechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pixotritechnologies.com now to see the best up-to-date Pixotritechnologies content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixotritechnologies.com

Software development. Web application development, Website design, Digital Marketing, SEO services, Animation videos,Mobile Apps development Melbourne-Australia

Visit pixotritechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixotritechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixotritechnologies.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.356

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixotritechnologies.com

227 ms

pixotritechnologies.com

660 ms

js

71 ms

css2

41 ms

css2

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Pixotritechnologies.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain Pixotritechnologies.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.7 MB (67%)

Content Size

7.0 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pixotritechnologies.com main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

  • Original 44.8 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 4.6 MB

  • Original 6.6 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pixotritechnologies needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.6 MB or 69% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 210.6 kB
  • After minification 210.6 kB
  • After compression 167.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 112.0 kB
  • After minification 112.0 kB
  • After compression 91.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixotritechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (31%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

40

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixotritechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pixotritechnologies.com

pixotritechnologies.com

227 ms

pixotritechnologies.com

pixotritechnologies.com

660 ms

js

js

71 ms

css2

css2

41 ms

css2

css2

59 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

134 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

259 ms

style.css

style.css

273 ms

colors.css

colors.css

197 ms

nav.css

nav.css

196 ms

all.css

all.css

198 ms

custom.css

custom.css

207 ms

solutions.css

solutions.css

267 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

321 ms

cookie-policy.css

cookie-policy.css

273 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

441 ms

yii.js

yii.js

314 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

438 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

433 ms

bootstrap.bundle.js

bootstrap.bundle.js

438 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

436 ms

logo.png

logo.png

435 ms

pixotri-technologies-slider-1.jpg

pixotri-technologies-slider-1.jpg

639 ms

pixotri-technologies-slider-2.jpg

pixotri-technologies-slider-2.jpg

643 ms

pixotri-technologies-slider-3.jpg

pixotri-technologies-slider-3.jpg

515 ms

pixotri-inspire1.png

pixotri-inspire1.png

442 ms

pixotri-inspire6.png

pixotri-inspire6.png

485 ms

pixotri-inspire4.png

pixotri-inspire4.png

495 ms

pixotri-inspire2.png

pixotri-inspire2.png

514 ms

pixotri-inspire3.png

pixotri-inspire3.png

513 ms

pixotri-inspire5.png

pixotri-inspire5.png

562 ms

pixotri-web-app-develope.png

pixotri-web-app-develope.png

641 ms

web1.png

web1.png

576 ms

web2.png

web2.png

577 ms

web3.png

web3.png

616 ms

webdesign.png

webdesign.png

830 ms

web4.png

web4.png

639 ms

web5.png

web5.png

681 ms

web6.png

web6.png

700 ms

pixotri-technologies-e-commerce.png

pixotri-technologies-e-commerce.png

832 ms

digital.jpg

digital.jpg

765 ms

digital1.png

digital1.png

575 ms

digital2.png

digital2.png

564 ms

digital3.png

digital3.png

578 ms

digital4.png

digital4.png

576 ms

digital5.png

digital5.png

616 ms

digital6.png

digital6.png

572 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

pixotri-technologies-animation.png

pixotri-technologies-animation.png

628 ms

animation1.png

animation1.png

564 ms

animation2.png

animation2.png

610 ms

pixotri-mobile-app-design.png

pixotri-mobile-app-design.png

959 ms

app-icon-1.png

app-icon-1.png

527 ms

app-icon-2.png

app-icon-2.png

525 ms

app-icon-3.png

app-icon-3.png

527 ms

app-icon-4.png

app-icon-4.png

511 ms

pixotri-getstarted.png

pixotri-getstarted.png

588 ms

e-commerce-bg.jpg

e-commerce-bg.jpg

574 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

77 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

92 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

94 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

92 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

648 ms

RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN-XC.ttf

RWmMoKWR9v4ksMfaWd_JN-XC.ttf

161 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

92 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

91 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

99 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

100 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

100 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

654 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

603 ms

sw_bg.png

sw_bg.png

710 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

637 ms

Accessibility Review

pixotritechnologies.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pixotritechnologies.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pixotritechnologies.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixotritechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixotritechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pixotritechnologies.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixotritechnologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: