8 sec in total
1.1 sec
6.5 sec
390 ms
Visit pixum.de now to see the best up-to-date Pixum content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixum.de
Schnell & einfach Fotoprodukte erstellen ❤️ Im Handumdrehen mit preisgekrönter App
Visit pixum.deWe analyzed Pixum.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pixum.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
1097 ms
1565 ms
912 ms
1741 ms
1740 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Pixum.de, 32% (12 requests) were made to Assets2.pixum.com and 24% (9 requests) were made to Assets1.pixum.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Assets1.pixum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (58%)
3.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixum.de main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 914.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 914.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 770.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixum.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 770.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)
32
19
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixum.de
1097 ms
www.pixum.de
1565 ms
responsive-critical-css.min.css
912 ms
all.css
1741 ms
pixum-icons.css
1740 ms
j.php
21 ms
0_61x60.gif
109 ms
pixum_logo.png
21 ms
analytics.js
13 ms
responsive-core-css.min.css
1703 ms
responsive-external-lib.min.js
35 ms
v.gif
12 ms
linkid.js
17 ms
pixum-icons-9c5c6f9716819494134abbb5737f7ab4.woff
95 ms
DaxWeb-Cond.woff
96 ms
DaxWeb-CondBold.woff
96 ms
collect
91 ms
collect
122 ms
responsive-core-lib.min.js
12 ms
responsive-module-main.min.js
16 ms
responsive-analytics.min.js
167 ms
image
20 ms
getCmsContent
209 ms
image
23 ms
image
26 ms
image
19 ms
image
20 ms
image
19 ms
image
24 ms
image
31 ms
image
27 ms
image
31 ms
sprite_footer.png
28 ms
XFAB7C17C298F48909E8C9F2BFAA5794B.js
201 ms
spef.min.js
286 ms
fbds.js
77 ms
style.css
31 ms
pixum.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pixum.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
pixum.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
ISO-8859-15
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixum.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixum.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-15. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
pixum.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: