4.9 sec in total
269 ms
2.2 sec
2.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Placer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about placer.io
Make smarter real estate decisions and close more deals with Placer.ai's location intelligence and foot traffic insights.
Visit placer.ioWe analyzed Placer.io page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
placer.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value7,860 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.445
21/100
15%
Value26.3 s
0/100
10%
269 ms
309 ms
396 ms
232 ms
627 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Placer.io, 81% (79 requests) were made to Placer.ai and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Placer.ai.
Page size can be reduced by 555.2 kB (40%)
1.4 MB
836.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Placer.io main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 695.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 497.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 497.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Placer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (62%)
94
36
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Placer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
placer.io
269 ms
www.placer.ai
309 ms
style.min.css
396 ms
style.min.css
232 ms
theme.min.css
627 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
271 ms
post-2144.css
418 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
332 ms
global.css
348 ms
post-15487.css
405 ms
post-1500.css
433 ms
post-14892.css
426 ms
ecs-style.css
501 ms
post-2119.css
482 ms
post-2138.css
498 ms
post-3562.css
526 ms
post-5438.css
521 ms
post-5649.css
552 ms
post-5972.css
592 ms
post-6151.css
556 ms
post-19576.css
587 ms
css
347 ms
jquery.min.js
354 ms
ecs_ajax_pagination.js
580 ms
ecs.js
646 ms
css
373 ms
js
393 ms
7e3a7f50672c4a9994c9b8999cc3dd2b.js.ubembed.com
351 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
645 ms
alpine.min.js
339 ms
widget-posts.min.css
714 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
707 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
711 ms
v2.js
348 ms
e-gallery.min.css
918 ms
post-1515.css
895 ms
post-1544.css
919 ms
post-1523.css
918 ms
animations.min.css
916 ms
new-tab.js
993 ms
custom.js
1070 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1068 ms
e-gallery.min.js
1068 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1078 ms
5995051.js
275 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1019 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
904 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
949 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
902 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
877 ms
hooks.min.js
835 ms
i18n.min.js
824 ms
frontend.min.js
812 ms
waypoints.min.js
867 ms
core.min.js
861 ms
frontend.min.js
813 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
822 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
822 ms
gtm.js
402 ms
j.php
419 ms
placer_logo_ai402x-onc6yw63cdv2bi8m8eps8fr1sczb4qf1x8fx55sc2o.png
629 ms
purple-arrow-right.png
756 ms
icon-retail.svg
760 ms
icon-commercial-real-estate.svg
947 ms
icon-shopping-malls.svg
754 ms
icon-finance.svg
954 ms
icon-hospitality.svg
975 ms
icon-municipalities.svg
948 ms
icon-cpg.svg
942 ms
bundle.js
450 ms
decision-making.png
892 ms
jeff-axtell.jpg
876 ms
emily-heppen.jpg
857 ms
json
288 ms
real-audience.png
692 ms
placer-retail-rankings-report.png
673 ms
daniel-klein.jpg
673 ms
marjorie-selinger.jpg
675 ms
placer-cross-shopping-report.png
599 ms
group@2x-1.png
602 ms
group-5@2x.png
585 ms
v.gif
99 ms
group-7@2x-1.png
528 ms
reliable-data.png
529 ms
icon-dashboard.svg
521 ms
icon-data-feeds.svg
590 ms
icon-rest-api.svg
586 ms
blog-Cover-image-970-X-670-px-72dpi-1-768x577.png
582 ms
optimize.js
160 ms
api.min.js
126 ms
breakfast-space-heating-up-768x491.jpg
446 ms
miami-tourism-heating-up-768x491.jpg
511 ms
Placer_logo.png
508 ms
json
90 ms
bg-6.png
507 ms
courtesy-of-airbnb.svg
511 ms
otSDKStub.js
78 ms
placer.io accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
placer.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
placer.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Placer.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Placer.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
placer.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Placer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: