Tools & Wizards About Us
plagiarismchecker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

plagiarismchecker.com

Plagiarism Checker | Accurate and Fast - QuillBot AI

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

107 ms

plagiarismchecker.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to plagiarismchecker.com homepage info - get ready to check Plagiarism Checker best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about plagiarismchecker.com

Instantly scan your documents to detect plagiarism. Get real-time and detailed analysis of your content with QuillBot’s advanced plagiarism checker.

Visit plagiarismchecker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Plagiarismchecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

plagiarismchecker.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,020 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.214

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

plagiarismchecker.com

64 ms

plagiarismchecker.com

24 ms

www.plagiarismchecker.com

7 ms

www.plagiarismchecker.com

18 ms

styles.css

2 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Plagiarismchecker.com, 19% (12 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (870 ms) relates to the external source Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

840.6 kB

After Optimization

741.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Plagiarismchecker.com main page is 840.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 808.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 26.6 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 170 B
  • After minification 169 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plagiarism Checker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 77.1 kB

  • Original 808.5 kB
  • After minification 808.5 kB
  • After compression 731.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plagiarismchecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (66%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plagiarism Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

plagiarismchecker.com

plagiarismchecker.com

64 ms

plagiarismchecker.com

plagiarismchecker.com

24 ms

www.plagiarismchecker.com

www.plagiarismchecker.com

7 ms

www.plagiarismchecker.com

www.plagiarismchecker.com

18 ms

styles.css

styles.css

2 ms

functions.js

functions.js

3 ms

styles.css

styles.css

6 ms

functions.js

functions.js

8 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

178 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

67 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

plagiarism-checker-logo.gif

plagiarism-checker-logo.gif

4 ms

1.gif

1.gif

9 ms

2.gif

2.gif

10 ms

3.gif

3.gif

12 ms

plagiarism-checker-logo.gif

plagiarism-checker-logo.gif

9 ms

styles_print.css

styles_print.css

3 ms

styles_print.css

styles_print.css

38 ms

format.js

format.js

547 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

31 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

51 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

379 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

24 ms

ads

ads

870 ms

ads

ads

774 ms

container.html

container.html

25 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

462 ms

sodar

sodar

79 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

37 ms

ads

ads

576 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

75 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

16 ms

icon.png

icon.png

14 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

13 ms

s

s

13 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

71 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

77 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

70 ms

bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js

bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js

267 ms

runner.html

runner.html

162 ms

aframe

aframe

245 ms

pixel

pixel

177 ms

dv3.js

dv3.js

177 ms

gen_204

gen_204

343 ms

css

css

198 ms

ad

ad

49 ms

feg8rL66UTsTrrlS9w_iUH8JqR_kCfLFdi2W6wljJCU.js

feg8rL66UTsTrrlS9w_iUH8JqR_kCfLFdi2W6wljJCU.js

184 ms

icon.png

icon.png

138 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

193 ms

Q12zgMmT.js

Q12zgMmT.js

148 ms

339 ms

rum

rum

149 ms

activeview

activeview

278 ms

WGg91BhL6Bhk3qTAPqmblqNZdzujbVjDoJfr3h8Q3EY.js

WGg91BhL6Bhk3qTAPqmblqNZdzujbVjDoJfr3h8Q3EY.js

122 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

264 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

278 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

421 ms

62bHydCX.html

62bHydCX.html

78 ms

bounce

bounce

168 ms

rum

rum

28 ms

pixel

pixel

21 ms

activeview

activeview

69 ms

ftUtils.js

ftUtils.js

64 ms

Accessibility Review

plagiarismchecker.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

plagiarismchecker.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

plagiarismchecker.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plagiarismchecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plagiarismchecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

plagiarismchecker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Plagiarism Checker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: