10.4 sec in total
286 ms
9.5 sec
604 ms
Welcome to plainsail.net homepage info - get ready to check Plainsail best content right away, or after learning these important things about plainsail.net
Web design agency in Lagos, Nigeria. We are great at web design, website development, ui/ux, branding, marketing, SEO and other web services.
Visit plainsail.netWe analyzed Plainsail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
plainsail.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value20.2 s
0/100
25%
Value17.0 s
0/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
286 ms
2140 ms
281 ms
586 ms
629 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Plainsail.net, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Plainsail.net.
Page size can be reduced by 641.8 kB (77%)
836.8 kB
195.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Plainsail.net main page is 836.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 403.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 167.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plainsail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 295.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plainsail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 178.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (92%)
36
3
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plainsail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
plainsail.net
286 ms
www.plainsail.net
2140 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
281 ms
lazy.png
586 ms
lazy.png
629 ms
lazy.png
636 ms
lazy.png
614 ms
lazy.png
579 ms
lazy.png
158 ms
jquery.min.js
221 ms
lfb_frontend.min.js
251 ms
lazysizes.min.js
415 ms
1209 ms
framework.min.js
315 ms
framework-async.min.js
520 ms
theme.min.js
323 ms
733 ms
gdpr.min.js
415 ms
499 ms
post-like.min.js
512 ms
e-202419.js
14 ms
903 ms
frontend.min.js
709 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
634 ms
underscore-before.js
760 ms
underscore.min.js
869 ms
underscore-after.js
802 ms
wp-util.min.js
826 ms
frontend.min.js
853 ms
998 ms
css
34 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
17 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
36 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
53 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
73 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
72 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
63 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
73 ms
webfont.js
683 ms
css
48 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.standalone.min.css
199 ms
272 ms
263 ms
views-print.min.css
106 ms
623 ms
590 ms
PlusJakartaSans-Regular-3.ttf
47 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
108 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
210 ms
udesign.ttf
812 ms
alpha.ttf
305 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
336 ms
plainsail.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
plainsail.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
plainsail.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plainsail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plainsail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
plainsail.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Plainsail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: