3.2 sec in total
277 ms
1.5 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Planning For Failure content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about planningforfailure.com
Because success is too scary
Visit planningforfailure.comWe analyzed Planningforfailure.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
planningforfailure.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value3,690 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.045
99/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
277 ms
9 ms
12 ms
14 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Planningforfailure.com, 18% (13 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) relates to the external source Apis.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 932.3 kB (59%)
1.6 MB
655.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Planningforfailure.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 881.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 172.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 172.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Planning For Failure images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 548.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 548.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 203.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Planningforfailure.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (55%)
69
31
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Planning For Failure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.planningforfailure.com
277 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
9 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
12 ms
stylesheet.css
14 ms
classic-081711.css
14 ms
all.js
13 ms
page.js
44 ms
feed.js
68 ms
plusone.js
190 ms
index.js
62 ms
pf_logo_with_name_and_tag_tumblr.png
109 ms
tumblr_inline_mudvvmNANw1qa45zv.png
230 ms
tumblr_inline_mj1s4jwa3o1qz4rgp.jpg
79 ms
x.gif
76 ms
share_save_171_16.png
76 ms
subscribe_120_16.gif
77 ms
tumblr_mbkdjyNkza1qa45zv.jpg
256 ms
tumblr_inline_mgyk58LeJW1qa45zv.jpg
86 ms
sm13.html
133 ms
210 ms
jquery.min.js
85 ms
jquery.form-n-validate.js
65 ms
get_num_replies.js
182 ms
xd_arbiter.php
33 ms
xd_arbiter.php
73 ms
lkFCiFvTVt8
363 ms
ga.js
86 ms
PVCYA964urk
77 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
238 ms
www-embed-player.js
259 ms
base.js
424 ms
ga.js
29 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
201 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
236 ms
fastbutton
326 ms
fastbutton
323 ms
fastbutton
321 ms
fastbutton
460 ms
fastbutton
316 ms
__utm.gif
172 ms
impixu
216 ms
ping
134 ms
impixu
168 ms
analytics.html
47 ms
login_check.html
92 ms
rapid-3.36.js
120 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
221 ms
postmessageRelay
278 ms
iframe_logo.png
182 ms
avatar_f21cf3ac6d6f_40.png
187 ms
like.php
180 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZnOZwP_q6pCwQUYCN0BCxu9nBPg
123 ms
like.php
243 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
137 ms
ad_status.js
148 ms
ga.js
138 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
76 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
66 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
120 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
122 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
149 ms
fy8tT2klpgR.js
193 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
207 ms
like.php
109 ms
like.php
147 ms
like.php
141 ms
cs.js
59 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
83 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
29 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
cedexis.radar.js
4 ms
planningforfailure.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
planningforfailure.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
planningforfailure.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Planningforfailure.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Planningforfailure.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
planningforfailure.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Planning For Failure. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: