Tools & Wizards About Us
planningobjectionletters.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

planningobjectionletters.co.uk

Planning Objection Letters and Planning Representations

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

161 ms

planningobjectionletters.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit planningobjectionletters.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Planning Objection Letters content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about planningobjectionletters.co.uk

Planning objection letters and planning representation for local residents and third parties affected by planning applications and planning appeals.

Visit planningobjectionletters.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Planningobjectionletters.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

planningobjectionletters.co.uk performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

planningobjectionletters.co.uk

1157 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

82 ms

style.min.css

230 ms

style.css

159 ms

prettyPhoto.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Planningobjectionletters.co.uk, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Planningobjectionletters.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.2 kB (8%)

Content Size

598.5 kB

After Optimization

548.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Planningobjectionletters.co.uk main page is 598.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 440.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 34.6 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 440.9 kB
  • After minification 437.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Planning Objection Letters images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 92.5 kB
  • After minification 92.5 kB
  • After compression 82.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 30.5 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Planningobjectionletters.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (45%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Planning Objection Letters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

planningobjectionletters.co.uk

planningobjectionletters.co.uk

1157 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

82 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

230 ms

style.css

style.css

159 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

161 ms

white_blue.css

white_blue.css

163 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

262 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

179 ms

script.js

script.js

237 ms

modernizr.custom.63321.js

modernizr.custom.63321.js

241 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

241 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

291 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

341 ms

custom.js

custom.js

342 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

343 ms

flexslider.call.js

flexslider.call.js

343 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

10 ms

planning-objection-letters.jpg

planning-objection-letters.jpg

92 ms

input_arrow.gif

input_arrow.gif

93 ms

menu_decoration.gif

menu_decoration.gif

96 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

105 ms

permitted-development-prior-approval-641x281.jpg

permitted-development-prior-approval-641x281.jpg

279 ms

neighbour-planning-objection-641x281.jpg

neighbour-planning-objection-641x281.jpg

281 ms

how-to-object-641x281.jpg

how-to-object-641x281.jpg

188 ms

loss-of-view-641x281.jpg

loss-of-view-641x281.jpg

371 ms

privacy-641x281.jpg

privacy-641x281.jpg

262 ms

planning-representations.jpg

planning-representations.jpg

196 ms

body_arrow.gif

body_arrow.gif

277 ms

rtpi.jpg

rtpi.jpg

274 ms

footer_decoration.gif

footer_decoration.gif

347 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

LiberationSans-Regular-webfont.woff

LiberationSans-Regular-webfont.woff

303 ms

control_nav.png

control_nav.png

88 ms

Accessibility Review

planningobjectionletters.co.uk accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

planningobjectionletters.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

planningobjectionletters.co.uk SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Planningobjectionletters.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Planningobjectionletters.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

planningobjectionletters.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Planning Objection Letters. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: