5.7 sec in total
2.1 sec
3.3 sec
317 ms
Welcome to ploepper.de homepage info - get ready to check Ploepper best content right away, or after learning these important things about ploepper.de
lII➤ Plöpper Flaschenöffner ✨ der innovative Flaschenöffner aus der Höhle der Löwen im Test & Vergleich 2024 ⭐ (100% unabhängig)
Visit ploepper.deWe analyzed Ploepper.de page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ploepper.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
2131 ms
43 ms
79 ms
32 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Ploepper.de, 12% (9 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ploepper.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (62%)
2.6 MB
998.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ploepper.de main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ploepper needs image optimization as it can save up to 120.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ploepper.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (68%)
74
24
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ploepper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ploepper.de
2131 ms
style.css
43 ms
960.css
79 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
admin.css
96 ms
global.css
96 ms
wpabi.css
126 ms
thickbox.css
125 ms
nggallery.css
134 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
130 ms
jquery.js
219 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
154 ms
ajax.js
163 ms
ckeditor.js
365 ms
variantenplus.js
188 ms
wpshopgermany.js
196 ms
wpabi.js
192 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
203 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
238 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
238 ms
ckeditor.js
470 ms
ckeditor.utils.js
261 ms
ckeditor.comment-reply.js
266 ms
prettyPhoto.css
279 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
284 ms
jquery.easing.js
304 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
306 ms
nivo-slider.css
317 ms
cufon-yui.js
403 ms
GeosansLight_500.font.js
436 ms
myriad_400.font.js
515 ms
custom.js
403 ms
hoverIntent.js
404 ms
superfish.js
406 ms
swfobject.js
417 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
362 ms
logo_3D.png
180 ms
body-bg-tiled.jpg
396 ms
body-bg.png
80 ms
search-bg.png
57 ms
search-submit.png
61 ms
nav-right-corner-bg.png
57 ms
navigation-bg.png
68 ms
active-glow.jpg
95 ms
sub-nav-bg.png
97 ms
sub-nav-li-ul-bg.png
100 ms
nav-left-corner-bg.png
114 ms
slider-frame.png
118 ms
loading.gif
142 ms
button-1.png
142 ms
button-2.png
144 ms
shadow-divider-1.png
157 ms
contentPattern.png
165 ms
contentPattern.png
187 ms
loader.gif
188 ms
drop-down-arrow.png
187 ms
Bild1_Slider.jpg
153 ms
Bild2_Slider.jpg
143 ms
Bild3_Slider.jpg
143 ms
ploepper_front2.png
272 ms
facebook-e1337628866597.png
114 ms
you-tube-e1337629008610.png
128 ms
twitter1-e1337629082296.png
159 ms
like.php
186 ms
vpd1GgSCNsd.css
21 ms
M0DWM6a_9ro.css
27 ms
AdP_CKHZFBh.css
34 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
34 ms
DFmZn3_ZO2h.js
52 ms
mfqI3d6rUg1.js
54 ms
_Qp3v7kqEMi.js
31 ms
Bw8qRoQ9D-v.js
5 ms
4ylGxU24Rah.js
9 ms
arrows.png
43 ms
bullets.png
43 ms
ploepper.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ploepper.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ploepper.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ploepper.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ploepper.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ploepper.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ploepper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: