2.2 sec in total
257 ms
1.8 sec
167 ms
Visit pocketslider.de now to see the best up-to-date Pocket Slider content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pocketslider.de
High quality motorized camera dolly slider.Perfect for time lapse and video for DSLR cameras
Visit pocketslider.deWe analyzed Pocketslider.de page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pocketslider.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
257 ms
96 ms
186 ms
188 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Pocketslider.de, 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) belongs to the original domain Pocketslider.de.
Page size can be reduced by 860.2 kB (52%)
1.7 MB
800.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Pocketslider.de main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 781.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pocket Slider needs image optimization as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 554.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 554.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pocketslider.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 227.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (55%)
64
29
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pocket Slider. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pocketslider.de
257 ms
style.css
96 ms
blue.css
186 ms
boxed.css
188 ms
icons.css
191 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
298 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
189 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
402 ms
jquery.cookie.js
276 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
276 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
283 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
280 ms
jquery.eislideshow.js
368 ms
jquery.iconmenu.js
369 ms
colortip.js
373 ms
tytabs.js
375 ms
carousel.js
389 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
462 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
460 ms
selectnav.js
464 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
469 ms
custom.js
484 ms
jquery.tweet.js
493 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
551 ms
twitter-flickr-options.js
552 ms
counter.php
344 ms
fonts.css
469 ms
base.css
475 ms
skeleton.css
491 ms
javascript.css
503 ms
shortcodes.css
559 ms
custom.css
557 ms
uniform.css
94 ms
logo.png
189 ms
slider-1-1.jpg
478 ms
slider-1-2.jpg
482 ms
slider-1-3.jpg
326 ms
slider-1-4.jpg
389 ms
slider-1-5.jpg
326 ms
whyus.jpg
388 ms
client-1.jpg
389 ms
client-2.jpg
390 ms
client-3.jpg
478 ms
client-4.jpg
478 ms
client-5.jpg
481 ms
as.php
204 ms
photos_public.gne
123 ms
117030959
75 ms
117492275
77 ms
low_contrast_linen.jpg
443 ms
totop.png
531 ms
accordion-icons.png
533 ms
TitilliumText22L004-webfont.woff
713 ms
TitilliumText22L005-webfont.woff
628 ms
TitilliumText22L003-webfont.woff
635 ms
player.js
110 ms
player.css
84 ms
ga.js
14 ms
vuid.min.js
105 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
16455685508_79cdf5e608_m.jpg
59 ms
16270414488_5b8a1f4ef5_m.jpg
58 ms
16641838881_728ba29168_m.jpg
128 ms
16456398701_b3948fbb60_m.jpg
57 ms
proxy.html
61 ms
506391044.jpg
121 ms
508741957.jpg
76 ms
pocketslider.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pocketslider.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
pocketslider.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pocketslider.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Pocketslider.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pocketslider.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pocket Slider. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: