5.8 sec in total
1.7 sec
3.7 sec
481 ms
Visit pointmap.com now to see the best up-to-date Pointmap content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pointmap.com
Drafting and Technical Mapping | Pointmap | CAD - GIS Solutions
Visit pointmap.comWe analyzed Pointmap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
pointmap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value4,650 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value26.1 s
0/100
10%
1664 ms
35 ms
54 ms
96 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Pointmap.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Pointmap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 504.7 kB (15%)
3.3 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Pointmap.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pointmap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 335.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pointmap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 335.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (78%)
68
15
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pointmap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pointmap.com
1664 ms
js
35 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
54 ms
all.min.css
96 ms
extra.min.css
77 ms
style.css
79 ms
style.min.css
147 ms
classic-themes.min.css
108 ms
frontend.css
103 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
144 ms
font-awesome.min.css
151 ms
styles.css
154 ms
frontend.css
154 ms
page-list.css
180 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.css
181 ms
frontend.css
182 ms
dashicons.min.css
188 ms
css
25 ms
pointmap.com
699 ms
css
40 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
185 ms
jquery.min.js
240 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
186 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
195 ms
frontend.js
234 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
232 ms
frontend.min.js
235 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
249 ms
responsive-menu.js
270 ms
js
105 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
277 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
274 ms
index.js
323 ms
index.js
324 ms
api.js
57 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
325 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
326 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
326 ms
index.js
336 ms
v4-shims.js
175 ms
all.js
268 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
374 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
342 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
354 ms
vimeo.min.js
328 ms
js
43 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
collect
14 ms
js
76 ms
collect
139 ms
cropped-cropped-cropped-Screenshot.png
315 ms
Image_from_Skype1.jpg
996 ms
IMG_1621.jpg
1221 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-12-11-at-5.52.15-PM.png
394 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-12-11-at-5.52.07-PM.png
393 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-12-11-at-5.51.58-PM.png
396 ms
recaptcha__en.js
176 ms
js
202 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xo.woff
254 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff
272 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
254 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
189 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
186 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
253 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
293 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
268 ms
font
268 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
271 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
276 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
267 ms
player_api
177 ms
bx_loader.gif
87 ms
mejs-controls.svg
138 ms
www-widgetapi.js
10 ms
qe9uXmnZAZM
92 ms
www-player.css
6 ms
www-embed-player.js
54 ms
base.js
96 ms
ad_status.js
181 ms
6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js
99 ms
embed.js
65 ms
id
39 ms
Create
169 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
128 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
133 ms
pointmap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
pointmap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pointmap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pointmap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pointmap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pointmap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pointmap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: