7.9 sec in total
2.6 sec
5 sec
290 ms
Visit poleetic.com now to see the best up-to-date Poleetic content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about poleetic.com
Nous cartographions votre dispositif digital et ses actifs (Noms de domaine, sites, réseaux sociaux, apps, SEO et ereputation) afin de les rendre plus efficaces.
Visit poleetic.comWe analyzed Poleetic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
poleetic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value12.9 s
2/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.34
33/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
2617 ms
164 ms
301 ms
157 ms
236 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Poleetic.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Poleetic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (32%)
5.1 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Poleetic.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 156.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Poleetic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 813.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 813.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 542.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Poleetic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 542.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (51%)
68
33
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Poleetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.poleetic.com
2617 ms
language-selector.css
164 ms
dashicons.min.css
301 ms
thickbox.css
157 ms
layerslider.css
236 ms
css
24 ms
styles.css
181 ms
cli-style.css
233 ms
settings.css
383 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
680 ms
font-awesome.css
388 ms
ilightbox.css
455 ms
animations.css
367 ms
style.css
376 ms
swstyles.css
447 ms
jquery.js
599 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
464 ms
utils.min.js
464 ms
wp-whois.js
525 ms
greensock.js
606 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
613 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
540 ms
cookielawinfo.js
604 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
794 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
791 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
619 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
508 ms
common.min.js
508 ms
jquery.color.min.js
509 ms
jquery.schedule.js
509 ms
thickbox.js
527 ms
jquery.form.min.js
527 ms
scripts.js
556 ms
comment-reply.min.js
558 ms
main.min.js
846 ms
wp-embed.min.js
578 ms
sitepress.js
577 ms
BrandT.png
184 ms
BrandT1.png
186 ms
fr.png
185 ms
en.png
186 ms
transparent.png
187 ms
01.jpg
433 ms
bigpicture2-e1443103913689.jpg
243 ms
bigpicture3-e1443103924969.jpg
433 ms
bigpicture4-e1443103934658.jpg
433 ms
bigpicture5-e1443103950517.jpg
462 ms
bigpicture6-e1443103960603.jpg
435 ms
bigpicture7-e1443103971635.jpg
452 ms
bigpicture8-e1443103983400.jpg
460 ms
bigpicture9-e1443103997357.jpg
534 ms
bigpicture10-e1443104010904.jpg
438 ms
ANALYSE-CONSEIL-img.jpg
481 ms
MODE-PROJET-img.jpg
514 ms
ACCOMPAGNEMENT-img.jpg
545 ms
LAFSQUARE.jpg
546 ms
ITGF.jpg
545 ms
CEGOSF.jpg
574 ms
LRMF.jpg
591 ms
ROLANDBF.jpg
614 ms
SCHF1.jpg
619 ms
CROSSF.jpg
616 ms
VALLOF.jpg
620 ms
BOT.png
640 ms
overlay.png
655 ms
sKd0EMYPAh5PYCRKSryvW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
151 ms
qhfoJiLu10kFjChCCTvGlInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
152 ms
32nyIRHyCu6iqEka_hbKsonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
153 ms
Xk6Ej5sJmDyCmXcFfXLBI_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
152 ms
EVhTOTBlAHgKHA6KCxbw4Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
151 ms
icomoon.woff
671 ms
ZHfgS8cZe-Etsd7MZLOKzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
151 ms
HeCYRcZbdRso3ZUu01ELbfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
151 ms
j_Db4VkBO8Lwr-AdESOGtPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
153 ms
coloredbg.png
536 ms
shadow3.png
520 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
519 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
23 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
31 ms
poleetic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
poleetic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
poleetic.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Poleetic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Poleetic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
poleetic.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Poleetic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: