Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

polixir.net

Polixir Acente İşletim Sistemi

Page Load Speed

10.5 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

295 ms

polixir.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Polixir content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polixir.net

Acente işletim sistemi, Hızlı Teklif Programı, mobil uygulamalar, acentelere yönelik özgün tasarımlarda web siteleri, sigortacılık sektörüne özel alan adları, ekran paylaşım modülü, gibi bir çok ürün ...

Visit polixir.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Polixir.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polixir.net performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.41

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polixir.net

1574 ms

style.css

286 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

1007 ms

startstop-slider.js

288 ms

slider.css

291 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Polixir.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Polixir.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (76%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

806.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Polixir.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 131.8 kB

  • Original 142.0 kB
  • After minification 114.1 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.8 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 2.0 MB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 621.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polixir needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 77% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 298.3 kB

  • Original 458.4 kB
  • After minification 456.7 kB
  • After compression 160.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 108.9 kB

  • Original 123.6 kB
  • After minification 121.6 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polixir.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (21%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polixir. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

polixir.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

polixir.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

polixir.net SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polixir.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Polixir.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polixir. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: