Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

polygraph.directory

Polygraph Directory

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

polygraph.directory screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Polygraph content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polygraph.directory

Curso de Poligrafia

Visit polygraph.directory

Key Findings

We analyzed Polygraph.directory page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polygraph.directory performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

polygraph.directory

183 ms

index.php

458 ms

calendar-jos.css

19 ms

iframe-height.min.js

23 ms

jquery.min.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Polygraph.directory, 81% (63 requests) were made to Cursodepoligrafia.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (458 ms) relates to the external source Cursodepoligrafia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (76%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

315.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Polygraph.directory main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 838.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 248 B

  • Original 555 B
  • After minification 509 B
  • After compression 307 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 248 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polygraph needs image optimization as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 77% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 609.6 kB

  • Original 838.8 kB
  • After minification 801.0 kB
  • After compression 229.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 609.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 330.4 kB

  • Original 396.2 kB
  • After minification 357.9 kB
  • After compression 65.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polygraph.directory needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 330.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (88%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polygraph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

polygraph.directory SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polygraph.directory can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Polygraph.directory main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polygraph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: