Tools & Wizards About Us
polyping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

polyping.com

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

81 ms

Resources Loaded

975 ms

Page Rendered

482 ms

polyping.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Polyping content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about polyping.com

Take a tour to the Polyping official website today and avail benefits of online Ping Tree lead generation management Software, to concentrate and stay organized on your business sales process.

Visit polyping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Polyping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polyping.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

polyping.com

81 ms

www.polyping.com

104 ms

56 ms

40 ms

css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Polyping.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) belongs to the original domain Polyping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 691.4 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

626.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Polyping.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 780.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 99.0 kB

  • Original 131.3 kB
  • After minification 128.9 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 405.9 kB
  • After minification 333.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polyping needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 520.0 kB

  • Original 780.4 kB
  • After minification 780.4 kB
  • After compression 260.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 520.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polyping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

polyping.com

polyping.com

81 ms

www.polyping.com

www.polyping.com

104 ms

56 ms

40 ms

css

css

24 ms

42 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

126 ms

63 ms

63 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

24 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

130 ms

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

62 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

121 ms

pp_logo.png

pp_logo.png

116 ms

slider_bg.jpg

slider_bg.jpg

412 ms

2.png

2.png

465 ms

1.png

1.png

178 ms

cta.jpg

cta.jpg

327 ms

tablet_index.png

tablet_index.png

328 ms

tablet_publishers.png

tablet_publishers.png

375 ms

tablet_advertisers.png

tablet_advertisers.png

242 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

110 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

111 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

303 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

107 ms

collect

collect

83 ms

nr-892.min.js

nr-892.min.js

44 ms

SEO Factors

polyping.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polyping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Polyping.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

polyping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polyping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: