Access polyplex.com. Polyester, Polypropylene Film Manufacturers, Polyplex

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.341

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

polyplex.com

220 ms

polyplex.com

355 ms

www.polyplex.com

748 ms

js

51 ms

normalize.css

173 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Polyplex.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Polyplex.com.

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Polyplex.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.0 kB

Original 43.3 kB
After minification 36.3 kB
After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

Original 792.1 kB
After minification 772.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polyplex images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.6 MB
After compression 550.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 413.5 kB

Original 483.2 kB
After minification 396.2 kB
After compression 69.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polyplex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 413.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polyplex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 61 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[role] values are not valid

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polyplex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polyplex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

polyplex.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polyplex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Polyester, Polypropylene Film Manufacturers, Polyplex

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

polyplex.com

polyplex.com

www.polyplex.com

js

normalize.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

polyplex.com

polyplex.com

www.polyplex.com

js

normalize.css

normalize-fixes.css

ajax-progress.module.css

align.module.css

autocomplete-loading.module.css

fieldgroup.module.css

container-inline.module.css

clearfix.module.css

details.module.css

hidden.module.css

item-list.module.css

js.module.css

nowrap.module.css

position-container.module.css

progress.module.css

reset-appearance.module.css

resize.module.css

sticky-header.module.css

system-status-counter.css

system-status-report-counters.css

system-status-report-general-info.css

tabledrag.module.css

tablesort.module.css

tree-child.module.css

system.admin.css

system.maintenance.css

action-links.css

breadcrumb.css

button.css

collapse-processed.css

container-inline.css

details.css

exposed-filters.css

field.css

form.css

css

css

shield-tier-r-md.png

embed