5.2 sec in total
806 ms
4.2 sec
178 ms
Visit polyspin.in now to see the best up-to-date Polyspin content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polyspin.in
Visit polyspin.inWe analyzed Polyspin.in page load time and found that the first response time was 806 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
polyspin.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.5 s
0/100
10%
Value25.9 s
0/100
25%
Value31.9 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.243
51/100
15%
Value33.0 s
0/100
10%
806 ms
26 ms
34 ms
47 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Polyspin.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Polyspin.in.
Page size can be reduced by 51.1 kB (9%)
543.0 kB
491.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Polyspin.in main page is 543.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 287.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 65% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polyspin images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polyspin.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (85%)
59
9
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polyspin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polyspin.in
806 ms
font-awesome.css
26 ms
css
34 ms
css
47 ms
bootstrap.min.css
246 ms
font-awesome.min.css
461 ms
nivo-slider.css
467 ms
preview.css
479 ms
prism.css
478 ms
chosen.css
489 ms
perspectiveRules.css
482 ms
owl.carousel.css
691 ms
animate.css
701 ms
normalize.css
717 ms
lightbox.min.css
716 ms
main.css
719 ms
meanmenu.min.css
733 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.css
920 ms
custon-icon.css
934 ms
animated-headlines.css
954 ms
color-switcher.css
955 ms
style.css
958 ms
responsive.css
978 ms
modernizr-2.8.3.min.js
1150 ms
thumbs2.css
1172 ms
thumbnail-slider.css
1192 ms
thumbnail-slider.js
1194 ms
jquery-1.12.0.min.js
1214 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1224 ms
wow.min.js
1379 ms
jquery-price-slider.js
1400 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
1431 ms
jquery.meanmenu.js
1433 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1441 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
1467 ms
jquery.sticky.js
1609 ms
chosen.jquery.js
1634 ms
prism.js
1670 ms
init.js
1671 ms
waypoints.min.js
1677 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1465 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1384 ms
jquery.directional-hover.min.js
1406 ms
jquery.particleground.min.js
1436 ms
jquery.logosDistort.js
1437 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
1441 ms
animated-headlines.js
1473 ms
lightbox.min.js
1386 ms
textilate.js
1405 ms
lettering.js
1436 ms
plugins.js
1438 ms
styleswitch.js
1442 ms
main.js
1474 ms
close.png
1132 ms
loading.gif
1171 ms
prev.png
1218 ms
next.png
1221 ms
logo.jpg
1232 ms
1.jpg
2235 ms
5.jpg
1340 ms
6.jpg
1383 ms
7.jpg
1429 ms
9.jpg
1429 ms
LibreBaskerville-Regular.otf
1444 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
13 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1785 ms
GOTHIC_0.ttf
1435 ms
GOTHIC_0.TTF
1462 ms
chairman.jpg
1455 ms
polyspin.in accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
polyspin.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
polyspin.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polyspin.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polyspin.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polyspin.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polyspin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: