Tools & Wizards About Us
polytra.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

polytra.net

POLYTRA sarl | Medical Equipment and Services for Lebanon and the Levant Countries. Planning, Consulting, Contracting And Executing Of Any Medical Pro...

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

polytra.net screenshot

About Website

Visit polytra.net now to see the best up-to-date POLYTRA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polytra.net

POLYTRA sarl is a dealer and manufacturer in hospital equipment, hospital furniture, laundry equipment, meal distribution system, home care and architectural products

Visit polytra.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Polytra.net page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polytra.net performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.169

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polytra.net

223 ms

polytra.net

556 ms

css

31 ms

css

49 ms

normalize.min.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Polytra.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Polytra.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 511.6 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Polytra.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 27.7 kB
  • After minification 23.4 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 259.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, POLYTRA needs image optimization as it can save up to 259.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 167.5 kB

  • Original 238.2 kB
  • After minification 206.3 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 167.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 62.9 kB

  • Original 77.7 kB
  • After minification 64.5 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polytra.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of POLYTRA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

polytra.net

polytra.net

223 ms

polytra.net

polytra.net

556 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

49 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

107 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

211 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

307 ms

styles.css

styles.css

408 ms

queries.css

queries.css

310 ms

main-logo.png

main-logo.png

310 ms

img-20160623093418-2173.jpg

img-20160623093418-2173.jpg

924 ms

img-20160623104036-8969.jpg

img-20160623104036-8969.jpg

520 ms

p1312804520-m.jpg

p1312804520-m.jpg

436 ms

p1312806605-m.jpg

p1312806605-m.jpg

516 ms

p1312966526-m.jpg

p1312966526-m.jpg

437 ms

p1312886574-m.jpg

p1312886574-m.jpg

512 ms

p1312967143-m.jpg

p1312967143-m.jpg

517 ms

p1312806718-m.jpg

p1312806718-m.jpg

521 ms

p1312966181-m.jpg

p1312966181-m.jpg

617 ms

p1312888351-m.jpg

p1312888351-m.jpg

623 ms

p1312867427-m.jpg

p1312867427-m.jpg

621 ms

p1312971696-m.jpg

p1312971696-m.jpg

625 ms

img-20160805131315-9606.png

img-20160805131315-9606.png

728 ms

img-20160715155533-1733.jpg

img-20160715155533-1733.jpg

723 ms

img-20160715155411-9576.jpg

img-20160715155411-9576.jpg

729 ms

img-20160623181320-518.jpg

img-20160623181320-518.jpg

731 ms

img-20160623181320-9091.jpg

img-20160623181320-9091.jpg

731 ms

img-20160623181320-6757.jpg

img-20160623181320-6757.jpg

828 ms

img-20160623181320-7469.jpg

img-20160623181320-7469.jpg

834 ms

imperial.gif

imperial.gif

832 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

835 ms

img-20160623181320-1877.jpg

img-20160623181320-1877.jpg

836 ms

img-20160623181320-6168.jpg

img-20160623181320-6168.jpg

933 ms

img-20160623181320-2386.jpg

img-20160623181320-2386.jpg

938 ms

img-20160623181320-7335.jpg

img-20160623181320-7335.jpg

940 ms

no-image-found.jpg

no-image-found.jpg

941 ms

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

944 ms

pace.min.js

pace.min.js

1025 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

1136 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

1041 ms

simple-carousel.js

simple-carousel.js

943 ms

mainCtrl.js

mainCtrl.js

840 ms

functions.js

functions.js

746 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

826 ms

icon-qv.png

icon-qv.png

843 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

717 ms

bg-orange80.png

bg-orange80.png

719 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

14 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

28 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

722 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

28 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

polytra.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

polytra.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

polytra.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polytra.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Polytra.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

polytra.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of POLYTRA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: