7.2 sec in total
251 ms
6.2 sec
750 ms
Visit polywebtech.com now to see the best up-to-date Poly Web Tech content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polywebtech.com
Empower Your Business with On-Demand Branding & Web Designing Services. Logo, Website Development, Video Animation, Brand Identity – Covers Everything!
Visit polywebtech.comWe analyzed Polywebtech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
polywebtech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value2,780 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
251 ms
796 ms
308 ms
422 ms
331 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Polywebtech.com, 12% (14 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 3% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Polywebtech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 236.7 kB (37%)
632.9 kB
396.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Polywebtech.com main page is 632.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 231.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 79.4 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.6 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Poly Web Tech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polywebtech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (37%)
113
71
The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Poly Web Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polywebtech.com
251 ms
polywebtech.com
796 ms
bootstrap.min.css
308 ms
style.css
422 ms
responsive.css
331 ms
js
56 ms
20908609.js
58 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
548 ms
popper.min.js
372 ms
bootstrap.min.js
431 ms
slick.min.js
430 ms
parallax.js
546 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
776 ms
cycle.js
577 ms
owl-casrousel.js
579 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
578 ms
fancybox.js
704 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
638 ms
script.js
688 ms
lazysizes.min.js
705 ms
tes-1.png
733 ms
tes-2.png
830 ms
tes-3.png
902 ms
tes-4.png
902 ms
tes-5.png
891 ms
tes-6.png
934 ms
gtm.js
60 ms
analytics.js
88 ms
home-web-banner.webp
714 ms
arrow-right.png
489 ms
our-combo.webp
1129 ms
moneyback.png
524 ms
our_testimonial.webp
1634 ms
footer-vectox.png
567 ms
collectedforms.js
142 ms
20908609.js
141 ms
20908609.js
141 ms
collect
66 ms
collect
27 ms
collect
29 ms
fontawesome-oswald.css
293 ms
slick.min.css
480 ms
fontawesome-poppins.css
556 ms
plugin.css
553 ms
fancybox.css
587 ms
all.min.css
25 ms
owl-carousel.css
614 ms
logo.gif
1209 ms
us-flag.webp
798 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
324 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
326 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
326 ms
default
406 ms
arrow-prev.png
199 ms
arrow-next.png
179 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
61 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
78 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
113 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
102 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
111 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
102 ms
twk-main.js
111 ms
twk-vendor.js
166 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
255 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
245 ms
twk-runtime.js
160 ms
twk-app.js
173 ms
us-flag.webp
368 ms
apps-platforms.png
368 ms
tab2.webp
589 ms
platforms.jpg
371 ms
tab1.webp
468 ms
branding-awards.png
369 ms
tab3.webp
707 ms
animation-awards.png
425 ms
tab4.webp
597 ms
02.webp
933 ms
03.webp
835 ms
04.webp
739 ms
05.webp
942 ms
06.webp
939 ms
01.webp
885 ms
08.webp
1077 ms
01.webp
1527 ms
02.webp
1459 ms
03.webp
1601 ms
04.webp
1511 ms
05.webp
1638 ms
06.webp
1366 ms
07.webp
1816 ms
08.webp
1876 ms
01.webp
1695 ms
02.webp
1957 ms
03.webp
1787 ms
04.webp
1905 ms
05.webp
2015 ms
06.webp
2018 ms
07.webp
2256 ms
08.webp
2643 ms
01.webp
2320 ms
02.webp
2154 ms
03.webp
2245 ms
04.webp
2241 ms
widget-settings
286 ms
05.webp
2068 ms
06.webp
2236 ms
07.webp
2270 ms
08.webp
2288 ms
main-combo-pack2.png
2271 ms
combo-pack-1.png
2268 ms
combo-pack-2.png
2297 ms
combo-pack-4.png
2284 ms
en.js
20 ms
combo-pack-5.png
2170 ms
combo-price.png
2122 ms
footer-logo.svg
2049 ms
all-icon-payment.webp
2052 ms
up-ico.png
2065 ms
polywebtech.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
polywebtech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
polywebtech.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polywebtech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polywebtech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polywebtech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Poly Web Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: