Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

pool.net

Pools kaufen beim Experten: Stahlwandpool Swimmingpool | Pool.Net

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

676 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

517 ms

pool.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pool content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pool.net

Pool kaufen, hochwertige Stahlwandpool Swimmingpool und Rundpool Schwimmbecken mit Profi Poolfolie in Top Qualität. Pools zum aufstellen oder einbauen.

Visit pool.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 676 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pool.net performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.532

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pool.net

676 ms

stylesheet.css

182 ms

thickbox.css

178 ms

startbox.css

191 ms

stylesheetbox.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Pool.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (701 ms) belongs to the original domain Pool.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.6 kB (33%)

Content Size

970.7 kB

After Optimization

651.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Pool.net main page is 970.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 564.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 57.9 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 564.6 kB
  • After minification 533.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 208.6 kB

  • Original 302.5 kB
  • After minification 302.3 kB
  • After compression 93.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pool.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (20%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pool.net accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pool.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pool.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-15

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pool.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-15. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: