6.8 sec in total
337 ms
6.2 sec
186 ms
Click here to check amazing Pooneh content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pooneh.co
بهینه سازی سایت و پورتال های تجاری ، ایمیل مارکتینگ ، نصب و راه اندازی انواع سایت ، نصب و راه اندازی سایت های خبری ، سئو ، seo
Visit pooneh.coWe analyzed Pooneh.co page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
pooneh.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value380 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
337 ms
4912 ms
94 ms
236 ms
243 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Pooneh.co, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Pooneh.co.
Page size can be reduced by 723.0 kB (74%)
982.9 kB
259.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Pooneh.co main page is 982.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 600.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 415 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pooneh images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 409.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 409.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 280.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pooneh.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 280.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (82%)
44
8
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pooneh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pooneh.co
337 ms
www.pooneh.co
4912 ms
grid-responsive.css
94 ms
bootstrap.css
236 ms
master-89dcc2c37b4c6fd8bc47655ad8e9d93d.css
243 ms
rtl-89dcc2c37b4c6fd8bc47655ad8e9d93d.css
167 ms
demo-89dcc2c37b4c6fd8bc47655ad8e9d93d.css
168 ms
mediaqueries.css
169 ms
menu.css
170 ms
rt_anacron-custom.css
254 ms
module_default.css
255 ms
mosaic.css
254 ms
showcase.css
258 ms
jquery.min.js
394 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
316 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
319 ms
caption.js
321 ms
mootools-core.js
413 ms
core.js
333 ms
mootools-more.js
557 ms
chart.js
411 ms
gantry-totop.js
411 ms
browser-engines.js
435 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
468 ms
headroom.js
472 ms
headroom_init.js
473 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
482 ms
responsive.js
486 ms
responsive-selectbox.js
545 ms
acymailing_module.js
550 ms
mootools-mobile.js
551 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
593 ms
roksprocket.js
594 ms
moofx.js
636 ms
roksprocket.request.js
627 ms
mosaic.js
629 ms
mosaic.js
630 ms
features.js
640 ms
showcase.js
563 ms
analytics.js
141 ms
logo8.png
80 ms
bg.png
93 ms
noise.png
94 ms
BKoodakBold.woff
157 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
190 ms
collect
18 ms
pooneh.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
pooneh.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pooneh.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FA
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pooneh.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pooneh.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pooneh.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pooneh. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: