3.7 sec in total
7 ms
1.1 sec
2.6 sec
Visit portablesoup.blog now to see the best up-to-date Portable Soup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about portablesoup.blog
“We live not for today, but for the ages yet to come, and the children yet unborn.” — Mary Harris (Mother) Jones
Visit portablesoup.blogWe analyzed Portablesoup.blog page load time and found that the first response time was 7 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
portablesoup.blog performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.179
67/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
7 ms
338 ms
63 ms
70 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Portablesoup.blog, 14% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Portablesoup.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) relates to the external source Portablesoup.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 127.2 kB (27%)
474.1 kB
346.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Portablesoup.blog main page is 474.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 218.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Portable Soup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 410 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Portablesoup.blog has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (73%)
48
13
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Portable Soup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
portablesoup.wordpress.com
7 ms
portablesoup.wordpress.com
338 ms
webfont.js
63 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
133 ms
style.css
125 ms
131 ms
global.css
74 ms
131 ms
style.css
73 ms
gprofiles.js
148 ms
wpgroho.js
124 ms
100 ms
127 ms
146 ms
w.js
144 ms
css
147 ms
global-print.css
5 ms
main-before.png
97 ms
cropped-bookshavewings.jpg
251 ms
2f5671e33bbbaef4536f4078ee5c90fd
245 ms
siteDescription.png
77 ms
main-title.png
83 ms
folder.gif
83 ms
bubble.gif
100 ms
tag.gif
173 ms
sprite.png
172 ms
sidebar-title.jpg
224 ms
file-sidebar.gif
225 ms
clock-sidebar.gif
225 ms
folder-sidebar.gif
229 ms
arrow-sidebar.gif
228 ms
left-post-navigation-body.png
229 ms
tagCloud-title.jpg
231 ms
tag-title.gif
230 ms
zig-zag.png
242 ms
image-1.png
362 ms
little-secrets-3d.jpg
388 ms
the-economists-hour.jpg
320 ms
shattered.jpg
320 ms
truth_has.jpg
318 ms
g.gif
189 ms
hovercard.min.css
67 ms
services.min.css
102 ms
g.gif
152 ms
g.gif
153 ms
main-title-edge.gif
46 ms
sidebar-title-edge.gif
46 ms
actionbar.css
3 ms
actionbar.js
47 ms
portablesoup.blog accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
portablesoup.blog best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
portablesoup.blog SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portablesoup.blog can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Portablesoup.blog main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
portablesoup.blog
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Portable Soup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: