Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

7.3 sec

postarama.com screenshot

About Website

Visit postarama.com now to see the best up-to-date Postarama content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about postarama.com

Connecting individuals and businesses to 1 million lawyers providing services across the nation. Compare the best lawyers today. Use our free directory.

Visit postarama.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Postarama.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

postarama.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

postarama.com

89 ms

h6c7z.css

52 ms

h6c7z.css

73 ms

post-22524.css

68 ms

h6c7z.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Postarama.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (270 ms) belongs to the original domain Postarama.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

336.9 kB

After Optimization

263.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Postarama.com main page is 336.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 175.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 64.7 kB

  • Original 76.0 kB
  • After minification 75.9 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 175.7 kB
  • After minification 167.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Postarama images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 288 B

  • Original 85.2 kB
  • After minification 85.2 kB
  • After compression 84.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Postarama.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (24%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Postarama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

postarama.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

postarama.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

postarama.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Postarama.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Postarama.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Postarama. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: