3.8 sec in total
630 ms
2.8 sec
462 ms
Click here to check amazing Power Compare content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about powercompare.co.uk
Use our powerful utilities comparison tech to compare prices across a range of services for business or home. Find a better deal with Power Compare.
Visit powercompare.co.ukWe analyzed Powercompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 630 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
powercompare.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value10,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.316
37/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
630 ms
62 ms
37 ms
557 ms
458 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Powercompare.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Powercompare.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 121.0 kB (17%)
720.4 kB
599.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Powercompare.co.uk main page is 720.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 590.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Power Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (58%)
72
30
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Power Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
powercompare.co.uk
630 ms
optimize.js
62 ms
share.min.css
37 ms
genericons.min.css
557 ms
style.css
458 ms
style.min.css
385 ms
dashicons.min.css
578 ms
css
46 ms
front.min.css
55 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
212 ms
tablepress-responsive.min.css
354 ms
caldera-forms-front.min.css
524 ms
jquery.min.js
374 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
432 ms
jquery.sharrre.min.js
432 ms
waypoints.min.js
555 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
238 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
69 ms
css
32 ms
style.min.css
307 ms
maxbuttons_fonts.js
362 ms
maxbuttons-pro-front.js
619 ms
js-cookie.min.js
619 ms
comment-reply.min.js
622 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
680 ms
superfish.min.js
794 ms
superfish.args.min.js
794 ms
skip-links.min.js
805 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
804 ms
front.min.js
887 ms
jquery-baldrick.min.js
792 ms
parsley.min.js
1021 ms
en.js
1103 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
852 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
941 ms
react.min.js
941 ms
react-dom.min.js
1148 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1033 ms
index.min.js
1127 ms
caldera-forms-front.min.js
948 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
77 ms
css
16 ms
gtm.js
195 ms
les-logo-white-full.png
594 ms
trustpilot-stars.png
951 ms
logo.png
658 ms
hero-clay-ipad.png
886 ms
hero-clay-smartphone.png
1041 ms
supplier-british-gas-lite.png
852 ms
supplier-octopus-business-renewable.png
874 ms
supplier-opus-energy.png
703 ms
supplier-e-on.png
992 ms
supplier-shell-energy.png
869 ms
EDF-Logo-1-2.png
868 ms
Love-Energy-logo.png
961 ms
Power-Compare-logo-Small.png
971 ms
Love-Energy-Savings-300x100.png
884 ms
UK-electricity-prices-per-kwh-300x100.png
1192 ms
UK-Energy-Supplier-Map-300x100.png
1090 ms
business-electricity-prices-with-CCL-300x100.png
1105 ms
business-gas-prices-with-CCL-300x100.png
982 ms
best-boilers-300x100.png
1196 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
323 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
351 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
240 ms
SSE-LOGO-hires-300x100.png
951 ms
E.ON_Teiken-300x100.png
1009 ms
logo_sp_rect-300x100.jpg
1300 ms
analytics.js
172 ms
recorder.js
166 ms
Npower-2-300x100.png
1260 ms
GetImage-1-300x100.jpeg
1186 ms
icon-search.png
862 ms
collect
45 ms
collect
60 ms
ga-audiences
64 ms
invisible.js
419 ms
powercompare.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
powercompare.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
powercompare.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Powercompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Powercompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
powercompare.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Power Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: