Tools & Wizards About Us
pps.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

pps.in

Prakash Parcel Services Limited - Logistics, Transportation, Warehousing, Custom Clearance, Project Cargo, Customized Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

267 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

274 ms

pps.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pps.in homepage info - get ready to check Pps best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about pps.in

Prakash Parcel Services Limited started in 1992, was the parcel division of the erstwhile Prakash Group, one of India’s few transport companies started in the 1960s.

Visit pps.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Pps.in page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pps.in performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pps.in

267 ms

main.css

140 ms

stscode.js

401 ms

scroller.css

144 ms

stscodeimages.js

432 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Pps.in, 2% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (503 ms) belongs to the original domain Pps.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 535.9 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

716.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pps.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 710.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 129.7 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 138.8 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.7 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 116.0 kB

  • Original 710.1 kB
  • After minification 594.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pps needs image optimization as it can save up to 116.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 267.5 kB

  • Original 373.9 kB
  • After minification 372.3 kB
  • After compression 106.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pps.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (12%)

Requests Now

113

After Optimization

99

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pps.in

pps.in

267 ms

main.css

main.css

140 ms

stscode.js

stscode.js

401 ms

scroller.css

scroller.css

144 ms

stscodeimages.js

stscodeimages.js

432 ms

main.js

main.js

149 ms

scrollerimages.css

scrollerimages.css

150 ms

slider.css

slider.css

203 ms

sliderstyle.css

sliderstyle.css

206 ms

scrollerimages.js

scrollerimages.js

209 ms

jquery-1.4.3.min.js

jquery-1.4.3.min.js

406 ms

jquery.slider.pack.js

jquery.slider.pack.js

274 ms

scroller.js

scroller.js

229 ms

main_bg.jpg

main_bg.jpg

102 ms

ppsl_logo.jpg

ppsl_logo.jpg

95 ms

facebookicon.png

facebookicon.png

100 ms

pps.jpg

pps.jpg

102 ms

iba.jpg

iba.jpg

140 ms

customertestimonial.jpg

customertestimonial.jpg

100 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

229 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

318 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

250 ms

slide5.jpg

slide5.jpg

328 ms

all.js

all.js

32 ms

navigationbg.jpg

navigationbg.jpg

176 ms

menu_mo.jpg

menu_mo.jpg

203 ms

stseff.js

stseff.js

227 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

283 ms

01.JPG

01.JPG

284 ms

power-Sector.jpg

power-Sector.jpg

296 ms

1.JPG

1.JPG

295 ms

26.JPG

26.JPG

308 ms

8.JPG

8.JPG

331 ms

4.JPG

4.JPG

349 ms

22.JPG

22.JPG

353 ms

telecom-sector.jpg

telecom-sector.jpg

358 ms

31.JPG

31.JPG

359 ms

70.JPG

70.JPG

368 ms

73.JPG

73.JPG

396 ms

55.JPG

55.JPG

398 ms

24.JPG

24.JPG

422 ms

66.JPG

66.JPG

425 ms

3.JPG

3.JPG

441 ms

35.JPG

35.JPG

445 ms

2.JPG

2.JPG

463 ms

44.JPG

44.JPG

461 ms

39.JPG

39.JPG

490 ms

47.JPG

47.JPG

492 ms

infrastructure.jpg

infrastructure.jpg

497 ms

19.JPG

19.JPG

502 ms

82 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

41 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

48 ms

67.JPG

67.JPG

469 ms

43.JPG

43.JPG

469 ms

42.JPG

42.JPG

497 ms

36.JPG

36.JPG

498 ms

32.JPG

32.JPG

503 ms

52.JPG

52.JPG

469 ms

41.JPG

41.JPG

454 ms

auto.jpg

auto.jpg

430 ms

21.JPG

21.JPG

433 ms

64.JPG

64.JPG

415 ms

11.JPG

11.JPG

355 ms

5.JPG

5.JPG

357 ms

60.JPG

60.JPG

381 ms

20.JPG

20.JPG

376 ms

steel-sector.jpg

steel-sector.jpg

405 ms

57.JPG

57.JPG

405 ms

58.JPG

58.JPG

401 ms

ga.js

ga.js

18 ms

psus.jpg

psus.jpg

381 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

9.JPG

9.JPG

387 ms

72.JPG

72.JPG

388 ms

37.JPG

37.JPG

413 ms

28.JPG

28.JPG

410 ms

25.JPG

25.JPG

417 ms

38.JPG

38.JPG

410 ms

like.php

like.php

70 ms

33.JPG

33.JPG

404 ms

other-sector.jpg

other-sector.jpg

409 ms

12.JPG

12.JPG

411 ms

23.JPG

23.JPG

409 ms

TY3MhkXpWJ-.js

TY3MhkXpWJ-.js

22 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

14 ms

15.JPG

15.JPG

402 ms

7.JPG

7.JPG

403 ms

50.JPG

50.JPG

410 ms

10.JPG

10.JPG

415 ms

62.JPG

62.JPG

410 ms

69.JPG

69.JPG

411 ms

68.JPG

68.JPG

415 ms

65.JPG

65.JPG

413 ms

13.JPG

13.JPG

411 ms

49.JPG

49.JPG

414 ms

53.JPG

53.JPG

412 ms

18.JPG

18.JPG

412 ms

17.JPG

17.JPG

420 ms

71.JPG

71.JPG

417 ms

scroller_topbg1_01.jpg

scroller_topbg1_01.jpg

454 ms

scroller_topbg1_02.jpg

scroller_topbg1_02.jpg

453 ms

scroller_topbg1_03.jpg

scroller_topbg1_03.jpg

427 ms

border02_l.gif

border02_l.gif

422 ms

border02_r.gif

border02_r.gif

418 ms

border02_bl.gif

border02_bl.gif

417 ms

border02_b.gif

border02_b.gif

459 ms

border02_br.gif

border02_br.gif

455 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

430 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

427 ms

smallbuottons.jpg

smallbuottons.jpg

419 ms

footerbg.jpg

footerbg.jpg

419 ms

customertestimonial_mo.jpg

customertestimonial_mo.jpg

70 ms

distance_calculator_hov.jpg

distance_calculator_hov.jpg

72 ms

Accessibility Review

pps.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pps.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pps.in SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pps.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pps.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pps.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: