4.5 sec in total
617 ms
2.2 sec
1.6 sec
Visit praxis.tech now to see the best up-to-date Praxis content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about praxis.tech
Power your payments with Praxis' feature-rich advanced payment products, boost approval rates, diversify payment methods and enjoy our global coverage.
Visit praxis.techWe analyzed Praxis.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 617 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
praxis.tech performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value22.2 s
0/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value3,930 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value25.9 s
0/100
10%
617 ms
94 ms
239 ms
204 ms
260 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Praxis.tech, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Kit.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (798 ms) belongs to the original domain Praxis.tech.
Page size can be reduced by 179.3 kB (2%)
8.5 MB
8.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Praxis.tech main page is 8.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Praxis images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Praxis.tech needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (44%)
57
32
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Praxis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
praxis.tech
617 ms
28b3a3fab0.js
94 ms
main.min.css
239 ms
theme-overrides.min.css
204 ms
module_86581478123_navigation.min.css
260 ms
module_88626633191_hero_section.min.css
219 ms
module_86213003229_bento_cards.min.css
312 ms
module_84185968850_section_title.min.css
287 ms
module_82189733577_info_card.min.css
452 ms
module_82468394185_text_block.min.css
433 ms
module_82380186310_logos_list.min.css
515 ms
module_81515475432_button.min.css
467 ms
module_86181045743_footer_menu.min.css
665 ms
module_88435719140_footer_notice.min.css
572 ms
js
88 ms
embed.js
468 ms
main.min.js
724 ms
project.js
486 ms
index.min.js
722 ms
module_82189733577_info_card.min.js
722 ms
module_86181045743_footer_menu.min.js
751 ms
26829722.js
798 ms
index.js
723 ms
css2
29 ms
25.svg
79 ms
Logo-24-W.svg
55 ms
Cashier.png
85 ms
%5BImagery%5D%20%5BMenu%5D%20Direct-1.png
81 ms
%5BDropdown%5D%20%5BMenu%5D%20%5BProduct%5D%20Cashier.png
84 ms
Rectangle%202988%20%281%29.png
157 ms
praxis.tech
585 ms
yahoo.png
156 ms
finech.png
128 ms
ap.png
127 ms
gambling.png
188 ms
bullion.png
222 ms
coins-banner.png
221 ms
payment-1.svg
189 ms
hero_image%20%287%29.png
138 ms
Increased%20Approvals-1.png
152 ms
support.png
148 ms
integration.png
170 ms
End%20user%20satisfaction-1.png
180 ms
bdcc.png
185 ms
delivered.png
208 ms
ratios.png
207 ms
analytics.png
329 ms
funds.png
209 ms
payments.png
218 ms
convenience.png
246 ms
Frame%20236222849.png
291 ms
Frame%2011565-1.png
246 ms
hosted.png
251 ms
Frame%2011566-2.png
326 ms
regular.woff
780 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff
32 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff
37 ms
600.woff
287 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff
74 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff
102 ms
banner.js
448 ms
26829722.js
515 ms
fb.js
447 ms
conversations-embed.js
450 ms
praxis.tech accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
praxis.tech best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
praxis.tech SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Praxis.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Praxis.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
praxis.tech
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Praxis. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: